[Teas] draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update-20 ietf last call Genart review

Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 23 December 2025 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from [10.244.9.115] (unknown [4.156.85.76]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6A29E7F869; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 12:31:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.55.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <176652190126.867786.4000943652705626946@dt-datatracker-5656579b89-p6k4r>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 12:31:41 -0800
Message-ID-Hash: VE2UPGCVDAA6DBEY6CSVBI3TBIZIE6YN
X-Message-ID-Hash: VE2UPGCVDAA6DBEY6CSVBI3TBIZIE6YN
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Subject: [Teas] draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update-20 ietf last call Genart review
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/-et8CDAh2abRwXekC0tgTj0qNZs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>

Document: draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update
Title: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

(My apologies for the lateness of this review.)

Document: draft-ietf-teas-rfc8776-update-20
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2025-12-23
IETF LC End Date: 2025-12-09
IESG Telechat date: 2026-01-08

Summary:  This document is basically ready for publication as a proposed
standards RFC.   There is one wording issue that I believe should be addressed.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:
    I believe that this was mentioned in other reviews, and discussed, but I am
    still having trouble with it,  Section 3.1 says "The "ietf-te-types" module
    (Section 4) contains common TE types that are independent and agnostic of
    any specific technology or control-plane instance."  Except that section
    3.1.1 then defines multiple MPLS specific identities.  Which are clearly
    technology specific.  If you have a narrower meaning of "specific
    technology" in mind, please use wording that conveys that meaning.

Nits/editorial comments: N/A