[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-03

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Fri, 06 October 2017 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E3F134315 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YhhzNAPeGmha for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73FEA132D89 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id h66so17136799ioh.11 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YD//lravb4ki+KtE+VFZdxyaoBY1F1h7j2OI48/tQPs=; b=KGqwwhdRwDpWLrwyI+2g+G6fHvzsYqkWHmdaBQwyqvlmqO28W6nwWzind9ZOtb3Tab rQL4gUzpDVN/vyOhdgoVHvDZi26POXuMB77cfbzB/WZZYQB0TQn/ejE2xmMFQ78dhxdp GmCewEPcEJqTcrSBZTvv1gGTB0kZ/vTaoB0Ho7FcO+a76Xjn9mqicY4Hd8orMVIxzccY ab0ov8ClBy652qLlTias6JBoxiBiiMpqiDEVnFZ6KLtDFzDyN9ySnzIZ9vtTPRPmGbMh S8ZJ6uoRNArYfI/hR5CLkN8cXxrfzY7oc6oAu9sEwoCqPwwD59jyJv6ssTktJ2NxiVh9 6Dpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YD//lravb4ki+KtE+VFZdxyaoBY1F1h7j2OI48/tQPs=; b=PpXxcRLebv6z28n3NUv5Zj1w5dr7kjqjcG+QqrYVPjvV+ONw35r9E1ac/YU9PqtDSC 1Q3tAR5QxZUuj4kLkj3fQkoGIuB/b6/uGUy5lwfc2CYleRN5jJxaweJLNaF5VP2gFEoU J44T7POzKlUgrqaDCXoaaHgcXsTqPjZLcjlAia8b4h6+9Dz3KcONlm+KRDAXckH1VDJ9 1zBoDEi7/kFfbE8ooKlORzeC1LnBcewKl3MZvD2nCkEKaLaWe1qdK5yyVn6+7H7viww8 9pRx8JtAU9MjR0wt9Bybo/1VYSnT3gmwRQBxL/1Ni8F/N5PQ/TGT6KLa58H5mOqPssH9 Xu8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUcrktThO8tzie3DZhWcvHvwCBtRzcMSyNe7rHJi91px17c7q09 /PSoXS4ZTosJ2oKxmYGpnnDpkUmhHqjg8qQHe8g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBasZHtRWHC3IKMg/6/eYZbOvCYvbB6rrzPncGn0mHWIK/EoKTv5AlhYE9i++m3hvLVoyN8OqwpIS4Roxr1zjo=
X-Received: by 10.107.188.199 with SMTP id m190mr4222072iof.255.1507324073766; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.15.140 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 17:07:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTs0o5vsekm+VcjVTSXAzprtQ16ORq7QNTvhu4TfrG7p3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com, bill.wu@huawei.com, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, afarrel@juniper.net, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05d470fa76c9055ae73b9d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/7g3psUCLrX2H5nVHUYRcxmiBkvc>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-03
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 21:07:56 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.