[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Tue, 14 February 2017 03:24 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACBD129463; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:24:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ZppFuTnb5dc; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED801129409; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k127so72964806vke.0; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:24:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=key1M7dbYhx9Kq5tExyEMyt3DWPjtOWwsY5i2kqFCa8=; b=tqEUKJvh/cRY1oiBu50BGhOsEB4swkVvMj3u28LKPRvp2eZuEl8rXxMqojv2HCnQZz VDLwNO8MRvmX2eNpu4DdgMxF9iKT1r9PylVIHETzgxypJvbmgAWTQkoYE3LrEb26/X2r HmuRrpdnD4HhMRlAliZcgi76ZML07bpCR3WcHoUEgxT1xEZbgLQgcojcvT3KhZJXjkNl hQHzsCjzSrXi1DQJ5GLpVhNl27aYHD2jdx8eNva4fXkOh9cce4VfHyM9V+4SsHObUC0j dKn4piHBlfA9JBk1ssydNzhAEVHhTcbZqK6G9+nP5RvPJlMTGi+hNHoFF7nC+VfMwEDU yunA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=key1M7dbYhx9Kq5tExyEMyt3DWPjtOWwsY5i2kqFCa8=; b=D5R94x9CCA3OBhPEP55cg6jloWaIlAsk4l5d50LkFRf7CdubBitwsprmjDuMgu9bri ggG4yGFgJ9oIBDFe3JsDYO0hOvnWTQMoe9TYXT6ikSRFbntK+IEBsQfdDIBvtdPSwqYT 56Pwn9lhLQSyNiA8U0MsXcKm90WUz3jwhAcizpbzMA9H/OTzkJvdRowVBkuZP1bbcEDF F9A8JkhRyb88/PjEW86InwVCpPdL4zzuemrHtEcg/003d7BZBJjrrqyjVsyAa7c21gwW IfFh9eTY25Xnx7rX43Hh2aHSmlPHrYoF/bM+nIFYE6RW7Fr5lsUyGdcPxQS+VYB88mj7 X1PQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mj7riJYBamqEYw2ZwtR79rDYqp/Llguw4nDdroHgV4UHL58Ys476VWhxAsBTq0LvCTqEGa4zd4KVsNaA==
X-Received: by 10.31.107.210 with SMTP id k79mr10553563vki.99.1487042687942; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:24:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.159.20 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:24:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 22:24:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTs2BJLdTqPjTsSA5EHu_3YKh-1JGc4AUA5QuOgbtdkyJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11478f162e486a0548751b42"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/IXs2ZYF2wSXVWbj5-VTpWYV18hk>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:24:51 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.