[Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-05.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 01 October 2015 14:34 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815D11A7003; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2W9KdvSdx9Mb; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75F61A6FCD; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 07:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151001143425.4603.51883.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:34:25 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/QdptQ9pH4dUaudf1ONUk0RmNtYs>
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-05.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:34:28 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group of the IETF. Title : Performance-based Path Selection for Explicitly Routed LSPs using TE Metric Extensions Authors : Alia Atlas John Drake Spencer Giacalone Stefano Previdi Filename : draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-05.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2015-10-01 Abstract: In certain networks, it is critical to consider network performance criteria when selecting the path for an explicitly routed RSVP-TE LSP. Such performance criteria can include latency, jitter, and loss or other indications such as the conformance to link performance objectives and non-RSVP TE traffic load. This specification describes how a path computation function may use network performance data, such as is advertised via the OSPF and ISIS TE metric extensions (defined outside the scope of this document) to perform such path selections. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-pat… internet-drafts