Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-01

Harish Sitaraman <hsitaraman@juniper.net> Fri, 06 October 2017 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hsitaraman@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E43133207 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Io2so442XEbZ for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2761330AF for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Ak9RL3tUNsdr7p3WivBa61tb3GXgbL1Gl6+M6PlJU7w=; b=gWWmPB1D2EY2r9koJ7qpGib3KhBHiSSDmosN71p7n0DAuyQLD12WwyicEtSX+tfEpbnG2dwNQ+EZZtSrdTepHxdD6iFB1+nyIX4FkESh3Bg47wlEBIPPdf7oaBccyKq6nZ+nzW2WewB9CbPqBiIYGHJiQcJ+PH1q3geGDQ2z0/c=
Received: from MWHPR05MB2831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.168.245.13) by BN3PR05MB2499.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.3.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.5; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 21:48:17 +0000
Received: from MWHPR05MB2831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.245.13]) by MWHPR05MB2831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.245.13]) with mapi id 15.20.0077.018; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 21:48:15 +0000
From: Harish Sitaraman <hsitaraman@juniper.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "inaminei@google.com" <inaminei@google.com>, "msiva@cisco.com" <msiva@cisco.com>
CC: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-01
Thread-Index: AQHTPtqmmaNyLUkguESz65Eof3VdhaLW5pMA
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 21:48:15 +0000
Message-ID: <55D8FF3C-4A73-41D8-84FD-77952970BB91@juniper.net>
References: <4dbd7011-ea7c-137f-7413-a6665ecc0f94@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4dbd7011-ea7c-137f-7413-a6665ecc0f94@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151206
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR05MB2499; 6:dcnOMMFTfCrQelh9HKYLqF8g+7GMQaGqMPIN9ZGNKWHJRJ+CNFqlDjCXjP9An99WiF7ly4bv2EBnob/d6FeJGJ0D/sJRvPwbUUUHhDGN/t+t4a4a+DkTvFyUYLXQYgBBc3+zk2FnqHccaccFTNka2/MURXOECGv8TcbEMKmBKQnxQhCwCVUZeUFDb6VYmb/10D0KH46OQ++xyzxVzobEXr5xPLEGRei3C/wRNC9zjIyKg73uMn11zSBoC2H0LVYHv2Uazc3Q7QabuU9G5P3cYNV4iacNrN8wlFzgsUhxwbU2S9G3Hed7V9o24kXvLYoThJ+O9LmMfccLThJmyfEaUg==; 5:Som9nf8c+bXC8M02HwRsw/ON5h6svt20C8dmj0nTr9j0xdRf/2gp17rvTQ1a3ajWeaS5UnnguoxV4PCP+wiHneaQzTp/jvKWeDCJTFwdQ68nylYKLDtG/OxuVhVZHIAJPw672fQ5AdTTEi1OK0zYAg==; 24:74KeRl/tGILF6J8H1esRdsDMRTjJaUIGL9D3y153xph9Nv9CnzE65EmLy9ooSyxmDfBKZm3v+ESaVlQv1wxl4SYweAfb1FEeu6NFzgiivhQ=; 7:+ekZ/Nxx15aR8D9KTgyEUo6KXax/E4me9gS3jYUFg7/xpNutjd6zaFAykfIIDjhNyVSjFsqrBVDNTvvsj6ED8Xtk4SyeH+Y0EJOkd5/NHaBJwrtwnDs8L+593Fdjv3TPtg08p4XSfLnkYqhCdUaMymh/+fpNfPLTeuYI9wrSE+eOTdNQDnncZGv6JKqx8ODkTyJ9vTC/0Hag8i7icIRayO7So0plhZACdwBJxug9jf0=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;SSOR;
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(377454003)(305945005)(478600001)(2501003)(8676002)(82746002)(966005)(99286003)(68736007)(76176999)(50986999)(101416001)(6246003)(14454004)(7736002)(81156014)(25786009)(110136005)(4326008)(316002)(53546010)(53936002)(83506001)(58126008)(8936002)(6512007)(3846002)(54356999)(97736004)(102836003)(81166006)(6306002)(106356001)(229853002)(3660700001)(36756003)(3280700002)(230783001)(6116002)(2201001)(6436002)(575784001)(66066001)(2950100002)(83716003)(2906002)(2900100001)(33656002)(1941001)(77096006)(189998001)(6506006)(105586002)(5660300001)(86362001)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2499; H:MWHPR05MB2831.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c987ad7c-0c45-4e0f-6194-08d50d03f331
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2499;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN3PR05MB2499:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=hsitaraman@juniper.net;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(10436049006162)(120809045254105);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR05MB2499274417DD21C1ED0FBE9DC2710@BN3PR05MB2499.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(10201501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2499; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2499;
x-forefront-prvs: 0452022BE1
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E332101E6AD8FD4580E1DB3563483BD9@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Oct 2017 21:48:15.8487 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR05MB2499
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/TJHm0t1zRNgKpg339NMlfjBsti0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-01
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 21:48:21 -0000

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft
Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules




https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2827/


Harish




On 10/6/17, 12:38 PM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>
>Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
>As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
>Please state either:
>
>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>or
>"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
>If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>or
>"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>appropriate.
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
>TO LINES.
>
>If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>and
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__trac.tools.ietf.org_group_iesg_trac_wiki_IntellectualProperty&d=DwICaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CXKOXD_3UIPrRhmyXS8lTOnJ2ZY8S-bng806Yu9IBa0&m=Pywa-FBPyN7utYVOxLoJmDQN1fv1yRnAllj-o5CDC_o&s=ZWlvBVCUsAuhrelVtyCvDjVunwt1ApZJfjwRMde6HR4&e= .
>
>Thank you,
>TEAS WG Chairs
>
>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>response.
>
>