[Teas] Thought on draft-chen-teas-rsvp-ttz
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 26 March 2015 16:32 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797901A876C for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OskRJf00VgWf for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C71FD1A875D for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2QGW6v3001983 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:32:06 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-b383.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.179.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2QGW4Zj001972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:32:05 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:32:03 -0000
Message-ID: <020b01d067e2$654561a0$2fd024e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdBn4lyZAX8YC5BgQjCBQ1zfWtK9Og==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1018-21426.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.113-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--1.113-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: b9K50FTGWzVqcOCJ4oqGauEbUg4xvs+wCQ3xS+zL6e267Q3uPo9KIwOR 3tZA0vji4vM1YF6AJbZcLc3sLtjOt7bmZosI/5Zy3QfwsVk0UbuGrPnef/I+ej5J/W5lWOurQFI wLyMOQrZFJXam6Mi+n8YuzsmbzL5MEimxoxTab7GvcsTuUejg0omQ2vqumwAFVUH85vIcwrl2A/ 3Nl4P8kQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/obuCckxOe7oGMk66OKm-Byz1tYU>
Subject: [Teas] Thought on draft-chen-teas-rsvp-ttz
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:32:10 -0000
Hi, I'd really like to see this work described in the context of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange I want to understand whether you are proposing a second architecture or something that develops from our existing architecture. Thanks, Adrian
- [Teas] Thought on draft-chen-teas-rsvp-ttz Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] Thought on draft-chen-teas-rsvp-ttz Huaimo Chen