[Teas] Dieter's comment
Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 15:00 UTC
Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F8312D957; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-K5hlrwKHiv; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 967F312D952; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E14B17A4A014C; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:00:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:00:08 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.168]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:00:03 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Dieter's comment
Thread-Index: AdPB7NVeqsCY/J4VQ3uCZLEd4APixg==
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:00:02 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173CFC0DF2@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.134.82]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173CFC0DF2sjceml521mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/wJu7QYde7koaeiqcvgB4lCamLqI>
Subject: [Teas] Dieter's comment
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:00:14 -0000
Hi WG, During TEAS WG session when ACTN VN YANG was presented, Dieter raised a comment that there is a similar work in OPSAWG Area (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-network-overlay-resource-model/) with ACTN VN YANG model. I have spoken to the lead author of the draft off line and we have agreed that we will work together with the current ACTN VN YANG draft moving forward in TEAS WG. Best regards, Young
- [Teas] Dieter's comment Leeyoung