Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bryskin-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-01
Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 07 May 2018 20:57 UTC
Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D6912D7E5; Mon, 7 May 2018 13:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebLEjDHY5Lq1; Mon, 7 May 2018 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 628E112D775; Mon, 7 May 2018 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id a10-v6so35834624ioc.9; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k/uEW/9eH0gh6ee/7WnWqbCZS4iMXDIDbCGS6eCgY1Q=; b=G5ASw38Ic1ZILiJur4xYJyW6owWzPGtjJQNd5CZ9LM0hH/0Cs6wKDL8dwELBhcwd79 iZLFcYeY/ZvQIXY/GCUrQoAnLfLX16REZtABKWzOcyT5M5Y8d06CBuLvaJyouTVlf0M5 vRqUGSaJGvrnulFq2+02Usshrp3B8JD/EpfARhKFlwvbLI/nWLBiBDfa16Hy0kLGx+1O 18ybKSK226UZJzB8NgyBTqcTGvTuA6LwyWimX/yNxD5s0K92Pjbp7W5jJKSNfcNDBEDk QXSVMxE7/FHe7ywv3JW0iO3jzREE0M3KchMPUvUe88TmF3PONcTb4s2VdgHHzaElKC4j ZhUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k/uEW/9eH0gh6ee/7WnWqbCZS4iMXDIDbCGS6eCgY1Q=; b=o+5OJR9u43o3m7YZ1TZ+zMm28jhfP4uKZXmkQbkzbb8OP5CkoFwk1OkAm9fr6q0+hZ r0tuyZXtpdB+rkYxgIT97jqnDxnKzURPHjzQMRk9eZzvmG7UEpityO9dGM63NIs2p0nz s0iJXUjBw0SjybgIt3u3yhk7A9kWIDlebuCxszJaLuVWR6cQ4Kmhqu7ACmzyLg79e7SF +B5Mbn03DjaEcwwXSn5aBz29fvBXCFl0AbQ1/Yp/wYvDzUw3Kojew7aM25/Zzhb+0XXs 4bqPkQIgn9lyGc14j2DhwLtITtgRcRwUpHw8N5vcZ1Gku1spA/qeVZwl1fvD4wTX0oZ5 szKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBI5/D940DKeD20p4q2T2V+jUNlZQbo0ecNoteYnxiB4sFPI7Ll AeaQ5cWb9asfx1rk3h/OcOn7c3YWvLbANNSX0js=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpzBdMhxkEVqUhGKOa2YU6uA4jCerMYdZ6gaP56ywgwg6vzanPP6bWwykGm08T/Sn6lHyZBwMT7t90oWFNhQ5s=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:a867:: with SMTP id r100-v6mr40962341ioe.143.1525726656812; Mon, 07 May 2018 13:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.137.195 with HTTP; Mon, 7 May 2018 13:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ba50cae5-d75d-8f09-7b72-341666e4e74c@labn.net>
References: <ba50cae5-d75d-8f09-7b72-341666e4e74c@labn.net>
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 16:57:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPSvuoKeCHvnOTnFqBx7OiaU41_QWug2pM7Z5tuxFqQsAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: EXT Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000675a73056ba3eb22"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/yYhfi8EZiHoZym0cKZyWEYsF9Wk>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-bryskin-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-01
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 20:57:40 -0000
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, - Xufeng On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of preparation for WG Adoption > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed > contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S > TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > TEAS WG Chairs > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > > > >