Re: [TICTOC] Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Thu, 15 November 2018 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C80E127B92; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:09:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lGp2pdCfWy-I; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012A9126BED; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E87FA3F882D3A; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:09:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.50) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:09:03 +0000
Received: from DGGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.8]) by dggeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.50]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:08:54 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
CC: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "suresh@kaloom.com" <suresh@kaloom.com>, "odonoghue@isoc.org" <odonoghue@isoc.org>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHUe/Lu4Wo4YovB006QqGBV6ISKZ6VQZmxw
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:08:53 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBC275BB2@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <154218363569.16048.13740876058203366854.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154218363569.16048.13740876058203366854.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.202.215]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/ZiULJSmDE6oOlaX0jY6hSahezQM>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:09:08 -0000

Hi all,

We have not received any comments during the 2nd IETF Last Call.
But based on the comments we received from the YANG doctor and the IESG members, the following changes are in our consensus:
1.	Change "MAY" to "can" and "SHOULD" to "MUST" in the 3rd paragraph of Page 4;
2.	Change "MAY" to "SHOULD" in the last paragraph of Page 8;
3.	Add "<" and ">" to the email address of Rodney in Page 9;
4.	Rephrase the 2nd paragraph in Page 29 to:
"Under the assumptions of section A.1, the first IEEE 1588 YANG module's prefix will be the same as the last IETF 1588 YANG module's prefix (i.e. "ptp"). Consequently, other YANG modules can preserve the same import prefix "ptp" to access PTP nodes during the migration from the last IETF 1588 YANG module to the first IEEE 1588 YANG module."
These changes are mainly editorial and have no impact on the YANG module itself. 

Thanks much to all those who have commented on this draft.

Regards,
Yuanlong on behalf all coauthors

-----Original Message-----
From: DraftTracker Mail System [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 4:21 PM
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>; draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang@ietf.org; suresh@kaloom.com; odonoghue@isoc.org
Cc: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>


Please DO NOT reply to this email.

I-D: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>
Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang/

IETF Last Call has ended, and the state has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.