Re: [TLS] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-05: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 17 September 2019 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4423312007A; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.026, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nv1N9dV70cv5; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D747D12004A; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id k5so11050032iol.5; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WXNzTfefGaHdTrxp/l2uFGMOTemUy+zUJSjYv5aC9+Y=; b=PEx42H0CxgkFxn3qure6Z4BFxQCQs1Vd5WDDMw3rIoAXCIcFK+eXbnTq8bNZ8gzz96 hQoFiCO3VjkuauTALygATZoo8Zl89ukoeH5YOxUSCYz7BaKZyNrj2oloy5Sizs3LUaRT aBYmGwKzfN8K4RzYFGHrgmr0AnAJY4CEL9pF20pRXfUwuLsGxXVWXOu0XOjrO2NeEMYk iCHZEaGtQNsbGoWpZekWfSIw2iT9OG0KxDosCh7qrF7Rb2ookXGb7TZjPd3oXerfkNlm ewh1F+tBvkar7dqS4xTmULQ3DknRjohOw4u58ZA37uYAmXSij6tog5KnjysA+j9KsR/Q 2utg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWWHCruLDAa6pSSVmOSGFO8vn4QlZCmByEclBI4GtQdeNSc3B7W RoVskJ3gUsl88QUn+MJOTd70HG0hSzuDYYUIVMs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwU2IhWF0t0jAgU93+ym+qsStiUiytk+n0qweoVJ2LAzU/DVxw0W0rrLihrDREV0UQ88+7TbTd4yX6mBpDDMfQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:96c6:: with SMTP id r6mr1009877iol.266.1568754173986; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156875392447.17507.3998113824897028508.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156875392447.17507.3998113824897028508.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:02:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+pSD9f-bAuzYKUA1uRPgbGaYFJ_J0uwQBHNe8WJBZGeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tl?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption@ietf.org, joe@salowey.net, tls-chairs@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/-3vhvL_itbfQssKaVJgUttjjh6I>
Subject: Re: [TLS] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-?= =?utf-8?q?tls-sni-encryption-05=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 21:02:56 -0000

> --Section 3.3 --
> Probably worth expanding "DOS" at first use.

Actually, "DoS" (with the small "o") is in the RFC Editor's list of
abbreviations that do not need to be expanded.  That, of course,
doesn't mean that it *shouldn't* be expanded.  But it should be
spelled with the small "o", in any case.

Barry