Re: [TLS] ETSI releases standards for enterprise security and data centre management

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 05 December 2018 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFDC130E4B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:13:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.161
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8QmFPL6XQKZ9 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3839E130E3D for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id wB5GCOlx020574; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:12:35 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=yXT6SyffVgy8evrTUf9tmX31HeJ/wySYB+i0AUcrqh4=; b=PoPQCYr4ZFy7hugjToHVA4JTcD6l8yvUVuuXGpOyBv/Lox325aomUOtfoRnqMslPYhqN 8kRyzF83oh11AWLChubLd7r3Qe6YzSj3kf3/zB465tWLuSJRIHWrPQUFc8R86NWgXMlo +t/qU8CnT3D/8U90p9vEBmhtnbNFolDQH+9NeJj3RwgCpRrZNzM20VseKtqcJEeYAmo0 HrxFix7YHyoy4P+8csg8cfckhiQ1MNtSM+cqAY+jUQzU5zEz+TnUOS+mt/k9+8FwnbRG V9nBKo9f1hFys8jIu3wm7MUNeKjY/RA7ylm/UWeGmJamug8HO/BwaupgcXaNnriZi5un qw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2p6hn0r2n5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 16:12:35 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id wB5G2mk7032481; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:12:34 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2p3pgygey7-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 05 Dec 2018 11:12:34 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:12:32 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:12:32 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] ETSI releases standards for enterprise security and data centre management
Thread-Index: AQHUiVXXQFagoRrVsk25xkld3wlR0qVqb6uAgAADZQCAABQ6AIAACr0AgAVf9wCAAHarAA==
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:12:31 +0000
Message-ID: <72A9FCAE-49CA-4870-9009-871958FE3CB5@akamai.com>
References: <CADqLbzKd-AgDRv2suZ-0Nz4jNUqKg0RNT8sgQd-n793t+gEN3g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVKZT1ScvHeP3=Kv2zodVimHkaAtG-2DTq6ojnF+q-OMSQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADqLbzL16cnm-WQXj4bh9awOp6Qqnu21cQd3T9XxpVhHse8yoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMV+ppxTmNaBdTOEkXzX_LWWcE=RMu4sxN3CsHTEga_8M2Q@mail.gmail.com> <7de09a4c-4ba9-d4ac-3371-89af3294f424@huitema.net> <87in08lipp.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <87in08lipp.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.14.0.181202
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.36.230]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2210E8BF3F2D924DA423300C18F7C119@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-12-05_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=831 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812050142
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-12-05_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=825 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812050144
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/BOcIb3uQ115Sw8iR49ZYRNfQqdU>
Subject: Re: [TLS] ETSI releases standards for enterprise security and data centre management
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 16:13:10 -0000

>    One mitigating factor of the ETSI standard, i suppose, is that the
    CABForum's Baseline Requirements forbid issuance of a certificate with
    any subjectAltName other than dNSName or iPAddress, so otherName looks
    like it must not be issued by standard public CAs.
  
Ooh, good catch.  I bet the ETSI folks didn't know this.