Re: [TLS] how close are we?

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 12 October 2016 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DAC12946D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aFRJgf_qlwJQ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x236.google.com (mail-yb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B7271293E9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x236.google.com with SMTP id e20so15362847ybb.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ef2rIgodjFutiC/Xj62Q4LfYqwmcYkDEOz1BY5EA7Dk=; b=wvioau82lEOxh49n9m3nB7lCDnkkJ3GY25lfTvU+Lpv1BFEy1sZxEdUR4tTu3iR5eF UasFhXCuS0NTBSI4nSu4lE0JpCTTpCOqWr79zJ4M/LuAzSXtl61NOitzmwFXpcDksCDk tunE4PNKCyOXDcEgam6jvJTcYjUtVavuh0JQp3RX/FGokXaF9uWLOh7NoJE9pfUTNfEd 7DQHLVafhvJbz2WQsDy8r8zowNmWUIuLPdY1ThoxtmbohEcpYgTK6WlM9SslWUxu8bdd IXNFRff9CkXVgacFClPwqXS+5Ry2aXtqWl6FsvFv4x1drqcprg1PKGACuI3BAz46lgMz AHFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ef2rIgodjFutiC/Xj62Q4LfYqwmcYkDEOz1BY5EA7Dk=; b=CePSubpcregeYOJFjc1jwQKj5azUiMNhOMN1BZy4kJsXaRisKmI6PhCAiefC+Ja54p Odu5iq5PmpY5ruDMUVnzIvIczuzE8BqjzTHLe4fQW2ysdYlOOJe5sK2EUAm/CVqEPsbP N84nPLvMRcHNBXvuC4IlWIXZr8ZPQ+un1rKi3e491T6fCcNO9M6H/J73GpJhFudKzmi7 kZFtffXd2K215cgA6Gmpk3da+9tkfjke/sbodpyG0A7D6lEGJ/M/+Tf679gukq67t+6p g4rq3qvsiTR3YVMl51b8xi9+DqP1IfZFSVyJVa56M4CxyrhTuSfHKSMjmpeVog62NiF0 sSQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rmoei+srfLcQPcbkaox01oxgv2RFrNU63oT1jJDYLpj3KHBCMf0C5cirQlN+mErDFupmCVgcT2vevxwNw==
X-Received: by 10.37.65.142 with SMTP id o136mr6085277yba.65.1476239948553; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.75.212 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5c8856d676684aa189919fb1c59bfdb8@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <5c8856d676684aa189919fb1c59bfdb8@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:38:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMg5AQzEu_=uoqXs0FRZiZOm7OARvfQmZytK51DVRRN3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c019aabcd821053ea1e5bf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/vEIBfRalfA2mm38MF28vp3CI1os>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] how close are we?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 02:39:11 -0000

I've got a bunch of PRs in flight that I think we need to resolve one way
or the other.
I'm expecting the chairs to address those shortly and if all goes well with
that I'll put
out -17 next week and then we should revisit this question.

Best,
-Ekr


On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; wrote:

> I’ve been away, and sick, for most of the post three weeks.
>
>
>
> How close is this ready to WGLC?  Is it really just polishing the shiny
> bits?  I mean I can kinda understand that, but also parts of this seems
> like lsat-midnight late-night hacking.
>
>
>
> Looking for some input here.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
>
> Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
>
> IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>