Re: [Tools-discuss] [Rfc-markdown] IEEE in bibxml2 vs. bibxml6

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 08 May 2019 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1671202F9; Wed, 8 May 2019 08:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eztnozoqoeiZ; Wed, 8 May 2019 08:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD6F1202D1; Wed, 8 May 2019 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.106] (p54A6CC75.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.204.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44zgsV1NkfzyPp; Wed, 8 May 2019 17:50:06 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU3kmagEqwjN4qm8SnN3ngrJEeBFyHQMva=-qFN1NB3cUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 17:50:05 +0200
Cc: RFC Markdown <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 579023403.737533-ffa474c4ab1067dd9e29e6094d74383b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EE3C1001-2641-48C7-B98B-696E8F0C3B7E@tzi.org>
References: <E0C7D267-F536-4F11-A7A6-37B415870AEC@tzi.org> <AE58C9D3-69BC-4887-883E-B88F9D595663@tzi.org> <465df686-2543-2b8d-df81-3de036452a16@levkowetz.com> <FFCC22BF-CB0D-482F-AA03-2508D54F5956@tzi.org> <295f4971-c8b5-aca8-e25f-8a26f949bde2@levkowetz.com> <73C747D7-442B-4AD6-9DB5-4B9209E03B4F@tzi.org> <CAA=duU3kmagEqwjN4qm8SnN3ngrJEeBFyHQMva=-qFN1NB3cUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/LL8DKBLm3FxUJDibhdEw24SX7tU>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [Rfc-markdown] IEEE in bibxml2 vs. bibxml6
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 15:50:17 -0000

On May 8, 2019, at 17:29, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> The version of kramdown at https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/experimental.html seems to still be using bibxml2 rather than bibxml6 for IEEE references. For example, I used {{?IEEE.802.1QCD_2015}} and got the error message:

Right, that says:
  <!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.2.10 -->

Hi Henrik, can you do a `gem update`?

Grüße, Carsten