Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] What do do about SVG

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 10 May 2021 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1A03A2326 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7SzgxZE3Zk2 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9C93A2323 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcb12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Ff6NM59P9zyRn; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:44:51 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B9A2DE4-38F1-425E-AA00-B0BA39EC2640"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.6\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <75d1b100-e761-e9bb-2ae0-02266c86b499@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:44:50 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 642357890.663474-8eda4487e49c6c57bd7c4b9ae9ea4c67
Message-Id: <6BDFA0EA-D6F1-4443-B771-9B1A0AD56713@tzi.org>
References: <f564019-d8b1-76c2-2768-c135d834dc32@iecc.com> <763b8195-6139-fb20-aa4e-2b4d89b5681c@gmail.com> <75d1b100-e761-e9bb-2ae0-02266c86b499@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/StvU0GvMTwY0zEqt7I_cWLYcp_4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 May 2021 10:30:41 -0700
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] What do do about SVG
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 16:45:00 -0000

Since this little gem didn’t seem to make it to rfc-interest, here’s a copy…
(No action needed, I solved the problem in a different way in kramdown-rfc 1.4.11.)
[I had to scale down the crisp original images for this list…]

Grüße, Carsten


On 2021-01-06, at 05:21, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp <mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>> wrote:
> 
> clean SVG

Before svgcheck:



After svgcheck:



Much cleaner.  SCNR.

Grüße, Carsten