Re: [Tools-discuss] txtv2 vs txtv3

[Henrik Levkowetz <[e-mail]>]

Hi Brian,

On 2019-11-30 20:47, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> This is a bit detailed for the current discussion on [e-mail]
> 
> I've just started switching a draft from v2 to v3, since I know the
> RFC Editor is likely to do so anyway. So I am today (and probably
> not tomorrow) in a position to do a like-for-like comparison of the
> two .txt output formats. It's posted, as rfcdiff output, at
> https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/Diff-draft-carpenter-limited-domains-12v2-12v3.html .
> I'll leave you to enjoy it, except for these comments:
> 
> 1. Please ignore the content, this is an unpublished version 
> of the draft for now.
> 
> 2. The v3 .txt is correctly paginated with [Page 2] style numbering.
> John, I could send you the .txt file if you want to experiment
> with your own tools.
> 
> 3. There is a substantive one word difference (an extra "and"),
> because I couldn't be bothered to run the whole tool chain again
> for that typo.
> 
> 4. There is a bug in the generation of a cross reference (see
> the rather odd "Section 4 of Section 4" construct, which is correct
> with the v2 tool chain). Henrik,  would you like the source files
> to track that down?

Yes, please.

Best regards,

	Henrik