Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -latest pattern

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Sat, 06 April 2019 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98A3120340 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 10:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbpcN2-PKl5e for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 10:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 083FA12006E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.25.146] (69-77-155-155.static.skybest.com [69.77.155.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA86C2C60F; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 13:04:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <F4EFC3A3-BBC7-44D9-9205-ED60EE7863AA@tzi.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 13:04:11 -0400
Cc: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DF8CFFFD-44B5-4492-85AD-20369F0CD5EA@bangj.com>
References: <F4EFC3A3-BBC7-44D9-9205-ED60EE7863AA@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/pbgiU1PU63LYOmqvGYR7kyoBvIg>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.16.02 feedback: -latest pattern
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:04:17 -0000

I would be in favor of the submission process assigning a number based on previous state. New documents get -00 and subsequent versions are assigned the next revision number. That way, the document doesn’t have to specify a version number.

Tom

> On Apr 6, 2019, at 12:43 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Idnits should recognize the -latest pattern that Martin Thomson’s template uses and turn these four messages into one (or maybe even fix the fourth, because that very much can be figured out based on the pattern):
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> 
>  Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt:
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  ** Missing revision: the document name given in the document,
>     'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-latest', does not give the document
>     revision number
> 
>  ~~ Missing draftname component: the document name given in the document,
>     'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-latest', does not seem to contain all the
>     document name components required ('draft' prefix, document source,
>     document name, and revision) -- see
>     https://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines#naming for more information.
> 
>  == Mismatching filename: the document gives the document name as
>     'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct-latest', but the file name used is
>     'draft-ietf-core-multipart-ct'
> 
>  Miscellaneous warnings:
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may
>     comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378
>     work that could not be issued because of this.  Please check the Legal
>     Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine
>     if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer.
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to datatracker-project@ietf.org
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to webmaster@tools.ietf.org