[tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7635 (4923)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 03 February 2017 15:05 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A879A129DB5 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:05:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YEjDzdKFaohP for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C44129C1B for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 80C12B81127; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:05:45 -0800 (PST)
To: tireddy@cisco.com, praspati@cisco.com, rmohanr@cisco.com, justin@uberti.name, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, sperreault@jive.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170203150545.80C12B81127@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 07:05:45 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/UCbN8NByOhup0E7kX-08-XNVuZw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 10:30:30 -0800
Cc: text/plain@rfc-editor.org, misi@niif.hu, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.orgContent-Type, tram@ietf.org, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7635 (4923)
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 15:05:46 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7635, "Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Extension for Third-Party Authorization". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7635&eid=4923 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Mészáros Mihály <misi@niif.hu> Section: Appendix B. Original Text ------------- "key":"v51N62OM65kyMvfTI08O" Corrected Text -------------- "key": "ew0KICAgICJrdHkiOiJvY3QiLA0KICAgICJ raWQiOiJpZDEyMyIsDQogICAgImFsZyI6IkhTMjU2IiwNCiAgIC AiayI6IlpvUlNPckZ6Tl9GelVBNVhLTVlvVkh5emZmNW9SSnhsL UlYUnR6dEo2dUUiDQp9" Notes ----- "key" according https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-02#section-4.2 "The 'key' parameter either contains a plain JWK structure or a JWK encrypted with a JWE." According Example Figure 2. "key" in draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-02#section-4.2 It seems they missed to write plain JWK MUST be base64 format. So according the example coorected the above sentence: "The 'key' parameter either contains a plain BASE64 ENCODED JWK structure or a JWK encrypted with a JWE." Anyhow in RFC7635 Appendix B. the "key" seems to be not in base64 (JWK) or JWE encrypted JWK format. (Base64 decoded key value string is "Salted__"....) Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7635 (draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-16) -------------------------------------- Title : Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Extension for Third-Party Authorization Publication Date : August 2015 Author(s) : T. Reddy, P. Patil, R. Ravindranath, J. Uberti Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : TURN Revised and Modernized Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tram] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7635 (4923) RFC Errata System