[Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
Michael Tüxen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 09 January 2023 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69456C14F73A; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:55:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Michael Tüxen via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.4.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167329772640.4097.10932096850549929369@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Michael Tüxen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 12:55:26 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/GUeNtA83iwHBgxXb2Jg7-vPPzNU>
Subject: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-09
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 20:55:26 -0000
Reviewer: Michael Tüxen Review result: Ready with Nits This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. I have one point which is more than a nit, but not really an issue: For some transport protocols transient numeric identifiers are covered by encryption (like in the QUIC case), sometimes they are not (like in the TCP case), sometimes it depends on the lower layer (like in the SCTP/IP versus SCTP/DTLS/UDP case). The introduction discusses that just encrypting the transient numeric identifiers does not solve all issues. Readers might focus on Section 5 and do not read the whole document. Therefore, it would be good, if Section 5 would also mention, that considerations for transient numeric identifiers have to be made even in the case where the transient numeric identifiers are protected by encryption.
- [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-gont-n… Michael Tüxen via Datatracker
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-go… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-go… tuexen
- Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-go… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review… tuexen