[tsvwg] Early call for Agenda Requests in TSVWG for IETF 77 (Anaheim)

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Sun, 07 February 2010 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198563A6B80 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:58:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JfvBjqV25jF for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D2C3A6B66 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAK7lbUurRN+K/2dsb2JhbACGVLo5lxOEVAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,420,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="147024786"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2010 05:59:01 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o175x1sx021875 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 05:59:01 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:59:01 -0800
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.99.80.18]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:59:01 -0800
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:59:00 -0600
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-212uo3npvqn0000163d@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2010 05:59:01.0307 (UTC) FILETIME=[A55558B0:01CAA7BA]
Subject: [tsvwg] Early call for Agenda Requests in TSVWG for IETF 77 (Anaheim)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:58:05 -0000

WG

Can you each let both chairs know if you are planning on asking for 
presentation time during TSVWG in Anaheim (IETF77)?

We chairs are attempting to see which WG items are planned to be 
updated in time for the meeting, as well as which individual docs are 
being updated.

We're especially looking for any with a new ID they are or are 
planning to write for this upcoming IETF wrt TSVWG.

If you know that you fit into any category above, then please let us 
know the ID's filename, the subject (for new IDs), an early guess at 
how much time you want to have on the agenda, as well as who the 
likely presenter will be (usually the editor of the ID, as the most 
responsible person regarding that effort) for the chairs to interact with).

Thank you

James & Gorry