IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tsvwg] Re: [Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Fri, 27 September 2024 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6750FC169403; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.214
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.214 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.79, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pWihtvPlfqwz; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BA1DC1519B4; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Oj6sPnwJSMVWVoF2qj3uk+08xulURKvd7VOsw0E+EfA=; b=nvhVC2y8gmWkjtfD4E6W/1N757 DLkJPtKJi/cK/DUhCeVgFdWnO23kUjlHkq0YsElRfRsVtcpHm45uuLvWv5/H48p4uwTp4V10mGM8o YpFozBMEOybqymtPSUqWS0I0IJ8EpLt+cRe2epuMeOqjItGL5JYG5aAlV5hKAk352sraULGydD1H9 Y63BWl8vPGqpgLNJ50ZOxzyRXiePLwZxJhv/s/c85edA+Jg7U0wbcP1RDlRRr19S6sxbRUoqjQJVy IReVmbqOan8cBelYYUMayiVzySx5sVcMbmY9i+Zoo6tzAyHnaaIp4bISKj+GelmwH2ipbVwaED7gV JW3Ss5NQ==;
Received: from [172.58.116.185] (port=62086 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1suDCP-003CJA-05; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 11:48:05 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-52A13513-EC85-47C2-BEE0-31C507888348"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN0P110MB1420945A79355CA31C246E6CA36BA@BN0P110MB1420.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:47:52 -0700
Message-Id: <9136F52D-B6A9-410E-AE45-7B6B38BB92DA@strayalpha.com>
References: <BN0P110MB1420945A79355CA31C246E6CA36BA@BN0P110MB1420.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: L Templin Fred <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (22A3354)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Message-ID-Hash: LOLQFDLGB5YOKFT5ICDXEOP5ASN63EGU
X-Message-ID-Hash: LOLQFDLGB5YOKFT5ICDXEOP5ASN63EGU
X-MailFrom: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Fred L Templin <Fred.L.Templin=40boeing.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, Internet Area <Int-area@ietf.org>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: [Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/LvFwJ9y2b9srW_LceBqygAaBaeQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>

Content changes are not allowed in AUTH48, but We just concluded WG last call.

On Sep 27, 2024, at 8:43 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:



> UDP options cannot currently be used for still larger sizes

 

Actually, there is an easy fix for this which can be added to the queue for AUTH48.

 

Fred

 

From: Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin=40boeing.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2024 8:19 AM
To: touch@strayalpha.com
Cc: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>; Internet Area <Int-area@ietf.org>; IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>; tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

 

Hi Joe,

 

>That approach to UDP jumbo grams is incompatible with UDP options.

 

IP parcels and Advanced Jumbos per my drafts are compatible with UDP options for sizes

up to ~64KB. UDP options cannot currently be used for still larger sizes, but I suspect it

will be a long time before we have to worry about that.

 

Fred

 

From: touch@strayalpha.com <touch@strayalpha.com>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2024 8:13 AM
To: Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>; Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>; Internet Area <Int-area@ietf.org>; IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>; tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

 

EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments.

 

 

 

On Sep 27, 2024, at 7:58 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin=40boeing.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

 

Indeed. But if sendmsg() and recvmsg() can and do generate RFC2675 packets, it means that any discussion of obsoleting RFC2675 should be
off the table.


No one that I know of has suggested obsoleting RFC2675 - my documents do not say "obsoletes" (nor even "updates”).

 

That approach to UDP jumbo grams is incompatible with UDP options. 

 

And yes, there was a proposal to move that RFC to historic:

 
Jones, T., G. Fairhurst, "Change Status of RFC 2675 to Historic," draft-jones-6man-historic-rfc2675, May 2019.
 
We COULD have a new option with a longer length, but that’s not in our baseline draft.
 

Joe

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status