Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-07.txt

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Fri, 23 August 2019 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19569120840 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Bl_BtR3AiaL for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31129120839 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [82.152.40.192] (port=56198 helo=[192.168.1.122]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1i1DUG-0007ky-MO; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:36:36 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <CDD6E57A-014C-445B-A751-740646B9F38B@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:36:30 +0100
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C220A105-8332-4C7A-BC68-81E208AB5621@csperkins.org>
References: <156227070085.12263.1835095760619613412@ietfa.amsl.com> <CDD6E57A-014C-445B-A751-740646B9F38B@arm.com>
To: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/TN0SWCuWhIWav2g2zblrfpGbZNQ>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-07.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:36:40 -0000

Thanks, will fix.
Colin



> On 8 Jul 2019, at 12:30, Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>; wrote:
> 
> Hi Gorry, Colin,
> 
> Thanks for the copious edits.  The intro reads really nice and, FWIW, I
> like the way you used the Conclusions section.
> 
> A couple of minor suggestions:
> - Section 2.1, 2nd sentence "Some operator [...]" seems broken.
> - Section 2.2, you might want to consider replacing the reference to
>  I-D.thomson-quic-grease (expired) with I-D.ietf-tls-grease.
> 
> cheers, t
> 
> ´╗┐On 04/07/2019, 21:05, "tsvwg on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"; <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org>; wrote:
> 
> 
>    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>    This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the IETF.
> 
>            Title           : The Impact of Transport Header Confidentiality on Network Operation and Evolution of the Internet
>            Authors         : Godred Fairhurst
>                              Colin Perkins
>    Filename        : draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-07.txt
>    Pages           : 45
>    Date            : 2019-07-04
> 
>    Abstract:
>       This document describes implications of applying end-to-end
>       encryption at the transport layer.  It identifies in-network uses of
>       transport layer header information.  It then reviews the implications
>       of developing end-to-end transport protocols that use authentication
>       to protect the integrity of transport information or encryption to
>       provide confidentiality of the transport protocol header and expected
>       implications of transport protocol design and network operation.
>       Since transport measurement and analysis of the impact of network
>       characteristics have been important to the design of current
>       transport protocols, it also considers the impact on transport and
>       application evolution.
> 
> 
>    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt/
> 
>    There are also htmlized versions available at:
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-07
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-07
> 
>    A diff from the previous version is available at:
>    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-07
> 
> 
>    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>    ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.



-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/