Re: [Tzdist-bis] draft-tzdist-geolocate Status and Next Steps

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Wed, 24 October 2018 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tzdist-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tzdist-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27291288BD for <tzdist-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Fm1O-NzlXei for <tzdist-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ABBF126CB6 for <tzdist-bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id p34-v6so4522405lfg.10 for <tzdist-bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Nv0C+3oI67FPFnQFQYyAdKvzllRDDYGlhb1FXeHv7Jo=; b=phA5PuUh2B21+9MbWbVhok4twgs3wIpE97JpUKizCO/v2wc38pvj45HsoPJaU/r1sX 7HEkZPjkRKShwk6OjUtwkAfx4bKa9uY7glWyr/1g8/OcOLQchsnoAo5R7pgXbOHQ+3Uf yP83CDnwHnL+kvC3IGdbypWEkiCFV9Z/Uvuz4pP6AG6wEVf2+CT5Pq5SZAJzjHOqZTP2 JpOKshfSXTl7v5urfv6GVpJ5j/PCVMQX0derFBNfxy75wfFnlU5W+xEh+3wSotmCImPj THR760ALSn8TA1hYxZeFF3dFdaZLU/l51FBeOkNR8fbA7OriVagQ4a9UBAy5FmVy0/tG uPUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiB5JwBcVZ7tk/D2ZUdPcy0EXL2MnFhh18fxeIMW41VfWiD8ZJX BLDCGDSYYmWlKjTFQ2xZacDqWXilhFbQwg3HLvE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61zcoRipAH1GbUimADcSUz6X6Ker/QxIyBmg1QEnU0+crUpKufuVgokA28vOaPhvsOGwija+BqZcr+IuA6qvqk=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:8f45:: with SMTP id r66mr16549838lfd.9.1540400173525; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADZyTkkU8pYjdp=g-ubLnmxmXNWpYjvEeTW7R9Gt6DvTBgULQA@mail.gmail.com> <fb72649b-f4c0-c488-a704-8d524187b81b@cs.ucla.edu> <CADZyTkmb0x3KnZDz20Nk9i7Pa05piQ2rvA1S6Oy4RoQxQBqbFQ@mail.gmail.com> <47bd811f-b30b-4165-b51d-ade47f17a1ce@fastmail.com> <3d2b8bcb-ffb7-1b04-518c-4f8e5436bac0@cisco.com> <d61f46cc-08ea-6872-45d8-f3b6a8c5a3da@fastmail.com> <CADZyTk=g-OXGNJiQdwiGHxLDRvdxNuGYZaHXRZ6ztNgo3bdo0g@mail.gmail.com> <078b13d1-5be8-bdb6-530b-5c052c9a34d2@fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <078b13d1-5be8-bdb6-530b-5c052c9a34d2@fastmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:56:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkmdTDAt35o5C=zwQd1CJ0uF5ieY-hW28_uQgGA3UoJV7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: murch@fastmail.com
Cc: tzdist-bis@ietf.org, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027b0f50578fc5d04"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tzdist-bis/3muJ50mGz1CaUUteAJSUA3HG1K0>
Subject: Re: [Tzdist-bis] draft-tzdist-geolocate Status and Next Steps
X-BeenThere: tzdist-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Extensions to Time Zone Data Distribution Service <tzdist-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tzdist-bis>, <mailto:tzdist-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tzdist-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:tzdist-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tzdist-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist-bis>, <mailto:tzdist-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:56:18 -0000

Hi Ken,

I agree, please see my comments.

Yours,
Daniel

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:44 PM Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 10/24/18 12:36 PM, Daniel Migault wrote:
> > I believe we could have a consensus on the next version, and start the
> > WGLC on November 5.
> >
> > Here is my view on the draft status.
> > * Maybe clarifying the scope of the draft. I believe that one sentence
> > could clearly mention the draft does not expect to go beyond a mobile
> > phone requesting the current TZ.
>
> Probably "mobile device" (not necessarily a phone), yes?
>
<mglt>yes ;-) I agree. </mglt>

>
> > * Raising a privacy issue and recommend of using the extension over
> > TLS or a protected channel.
>
> I believe privacy is discussed in the main TZDIST spec (RFC 7808,
> Section 8).  Is referencing this sufficient?
>
> <mglt>I think the security consideration is fine - my mistake.. I was
referring to the privacy section in fact. I would re-enforced in that
section the use of TLS (MUST) as the geolocalisation is in my point of view
present a higher degree of privacy than the data we dealt with in
RFC7808.</mglt>

>
> > * Having a discussion on whether we specify the time zones associated
> > to the point or not and how to do this. While this needs some
> > discussions, I believe we could converge rapidly.
>
> Agreed.  I'm open to any and all suggestions.
>
<mglt>I hope the WG will provide feed backs.</mglt>

>
> >
> > It would also be helpful to know if there are known implementations or
> > people planning to implement it. I hope this will be implemented soon!
>
> I have an implementation in the open source Cyrus Calendar server.  The
> examples in the draft where generated using that server.
>
>
> --
> Ken Murchison
> Cyrus Development Team
> FastMail US LLC
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tzdist-bis mailing list
> Tzdist-bis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tzdist-bis
>