IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme

Mirko Nosenzo <mirko.n@incomedia.eu> Tue, 13 August 2013 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mirko.n@incomedia.eu>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DAE21E8117 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 059-04DkmdXz for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-x233.google.com (mail-ee0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0F321E8107 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c1so4097899eek.38 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=incomedia.eu; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=pY6iBurixA3azhYWEfAARYpzWgKEgOoIAFy4uVL/zFE=; b=Zg/C2izzjZ+glA4lLynjvz7GouqlUJuDPqO9RGXo0VDZmfxYJ2b3okFq+5MNZVZ17o nsa5qunpU6Cc1ER1GZ3dhbD8/Zi+8UH8OBnpyhpvQQZ/OIh9qKXfxUtxbrjD/fUXzZ4Y dollxELx5yMM1z0ORZU0wF0KZue29D8Tb1vag=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=pY6iBurixA3azhYWEfAARYpzWgKEgOoIAFy4uVL/zFE=; b=iaXN1YDK+5UIlNfWmS2Z+zVGGB1cEzwHk3V8vSN2n23f9V6ihClfTX4lfgFCj5Fme4 1ElJcVyiAGxNAW8peoLmDYdK02C8ukJhqcWQcr/50vLWAncW1YfBNK6YH+46Hpc/xDuC 5Srga2bjiNohwnJ0cYyGXPkFCwOnoDeh/myjwkkhr+rO4kLEkohUuejro/Szx4xO9Rr0 C2am1VtTNuUnVsIBDYfrcC7tlWJKYMSfvcyis83so/bDo18Eidgl5Zbp6/2gwZ1S2Ki+ 7fN7pXtm7xrTa/f5I3N51TMi0OAgSKVhouuivMhvCMgm8LxD4yQMt+nrrQKspNUl1ts9 6F7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/fmRDNcvf3JA3Y/8+5MftRl1XXniNrW0qoXeZBRiqTM6OVo+dCbNiihIRvsgltuj6HSd3
X-Received: by 10.14.7.71 with SMTP id 47mr6378534eeo.21.1376396442105; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.17] (88-149-230-39.v4.ngi.it. [88.149.230.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm65908726eeg.5.2013.08.13.05.20.40 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 05:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_56E883F3-AC31-4C88-BEE7-C001D4913F4C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Mirko Nosenzo <mirko.n@incomedia.eu>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMDM3ZfBD5L-_tQraK76HRn6ZOObm3W6AtS6Sbn2jc964A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:20:39 +0200
Message-Id: <051A9F86-ADAD-4108-91E3-69374BB0CD6A@incomedia.eu>
References: <490F1DBE-15CF-4F1D-96EE-DB5B465C936D@incomedia.eu> <CA+9kkMDM3ZfBD5L-_tQraK76HRn6ZOObm3W6AtS6Sbn2jc964A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:20:44 -0000

Hi Ted,
feedready:// uses http but by using feedready:<absolute_uri> the user can specify a different protocol.
Actually the app supports http and https only.

Since the resource is simply downloaded, the fragment is ignored.

Thanks,
Mirko

/*******************************************************************/
/*  Mirko Nosenzo   /   Software Architect   /   Incomedia   */
/*  mirko.n@incomedia.eu   /   http://incomedia.eu            */
/*******************************************************************/

Il giorno 12/ago/2013, alle ore 19:31, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Howdy,
> 
> The core of the registration seems to be this
> 
> Scheme syntax:
>    feedready:<absolute_uri> or feedready://<hierarchical part>
>    examples: feedready://example.com/rss.xml and feedready:https://example.com/rss.xml
> 
> feedready as a scheme with a 3986 hierarchical part seems to be pretty easy to parse. I'm a little concerned, though, about the other form, which apparently takes an unescaped URI as an argument but is presented as if it were a hier-part.  Does this get used with anything other than http and https?  You're also sure that this can never be used with a fragment?
> 
> regards,
> 
> Ted

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email