Re: [Uri-review] [dispatch] Internet-Draft: Using URIs With Multiple Transport Stacks

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 10 July 2017 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E32E128DE5; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 02:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=IRjK3+0s; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=am1CYEwR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G6elSJ9Xvg_m; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 02:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA401270A7; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 02:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8B020A8A; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:30:47 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=le1L3c9C4EyUTru7Ox GEaop5rAPKo4vYxmtFIBh/0iI=; b=IRjK3+0sSiC4gUCMa3oDykqMnSNRPnnlFQ hhVeLHHgpVPTkcrG4qP4mu0C4tk1S2nMbKt7EsIu5B/5i85+9/0qIWmhRIwE+H/w U/8MPoPn9LAgTlBmwbmyaxCDUFkoSHAfnx2Elqtfr0OJgRI2ICFli2Kww+gkFR4P s/+c4gVzLftxbrOyAxpOtunZOr3gbRH4udiS1KFMuSg2s6rjy+osQa+9a2YuxWPw XFb8mjGLbPWtMqCk/1aHPWk8v1v4l8LZ6d2Tcxd5I+xqmg767bH5PVXCQAh7+L5U I4Y84I6Wn9b0OTR2bv2HfvKSspXBMqg7/qUosT4C09TPCfDFqnZw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=le1L3c9C4EyUTru7OxGEaop5rAPKo4vYxmtFIBh/0iI=; b=am1CYEwR zSZc1ZdfD+w6BmfX+gZX63AoNr33qWMUrgHhncU8XXPSlks1kTrgiAsVcVenxhkH 8+TzHSTcqIaVdhVkKZ9hHkA7ZDg8L8WzTq7uU7iPbuz6Eay25zI3nPFn+eFxUF9M tMLkcgBNSsLOVmsd31vTk3IjZnLB5xXBFuBTMNHhykdu1Zws9mM1Cuyk3iFsYuYY 6jS55fZgi4cHZwxa0rcuoMFQPe3a9AYvgTZvx8bv64yxF+LqbvEdhdb5VXq10cl4 KBWYbI1vtxJX9n1YYP7GeYgWMQ1S06PJqqEDFgJWQfeSALQzhuz14zyHSRyoxTFL /+85AIcFsR9DEA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:R0ljWTXVIMbP4a1y-mDFD0dRZAmMR3n1vKWZSKJrOsArS641D-ZR7w>
X-Sasl-enc: mHaAEC8llzyntVAhNyWWThociHmglXPzOCDQgnIiwkkN 1499679047
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-124-188-19-231.hdbq1.win.bigpond.net.au [124.188.19.231]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5C72B7E8B9; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:30:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <f5b1spsl1mr.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:30:43 +1000
Cc: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2BA6A41C-7933-4405-997D-BE2D0DA69CF5@mnot.net>
References: <MWHPR21MB0125E2464E9B3A25E0FB8967A3D50@MWHPR21MB0125.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <f5b1spsl1mr.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/X2ItKnRSGqMCqEK_KsEnjiooMMQ>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [dispatch] Internet-Draft: Using URIs With Multiple Transport Stacks
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:30:51 -0000

Hi Henry,

Thanks for that. Looping in Noah and Dan (sorry for including you on a list reply!).

Why was the document left in draft state? Does the current TAG have any interest in progressing a finding like this one?

Cheers,


> On 8 Jul 2017, at 1:15 am, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Dave Thaler writes:
> 
>> Recently we've seen multiple requests (including from three different
>> SDOs) and discussions on different lists regarding using URI schemes
>> for application-layer protocols that can operate over multiple
>> transport stacks (e.g., UDP, TCP, websockets, HTTP, etc.). This draft
>> summarizes the various technical discussions and issues raised.
>> 
>> Not sure if there is any regular meeting time available at IETF, but I
>> at least wanted to share this more broadly for visibility, and to
>> solicit additional feedback.
> 
> The W3C TAG devoted a fair amount of effort to this issue about 12 years
> ago, and our thinking at the time (2005) is recorded here:
> 
>  https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/SchemeProtocols.html
> 
> which may provide a useful independent perspective, albeit somewhat
> dated in some respects.
> 
> ht
> -- 
>       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
>      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/