Review requested of draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Mon, 04 April 2016 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6548012D5FE; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SzAbrYprfoOJ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD6712D53F; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0053301.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id u34FNWZP043363; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:34:05 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 223tb0suv2-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:34:04 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u34FY3PA002109; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:34:03 -0400
Received: from alpi133.aldc.att.com (alpi133.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.3]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u34FXw0L002020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:33:59 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAG.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.156]) by alpi133.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:33:41 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.171]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAG.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.156]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:33:41 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>, "urn-nid@ietf.org" <urn-nid@ietf.org>
Subject: Review requested of draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01
Thread-Topic: Review requested of draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01
Thread-Index: AdGOhitbQ4UWbC5zT3CFh+5H+csBzQ==
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:33:41 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114263C196@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.197.64]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-04-04_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1601100000 definitions=main-1604040227
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/dyVBhNWWyDmiB6ouoBgjJkIPkf8>
Cc: "Benoit Claise \(bclaise@cisco.com\)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:34:09 -0000

Hi URN experts,
A review of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bbf-bbf-urn-01 would be much appreciated. Benoit has said he will AD sponsor this draft.

Just to tackle an obvious question that will come to the minds of many: Why is BBF asking for 3 namespaces?
2 of the namespaces requested are historical namespaces that BBF has squatted on for many years. Both are in wide use in many service provider environments. Because of this, BBF thinks it would be best to get these 2 legitimized and out of the squatter shadows. 
For new efforts, BBF would like to use the "bbf" namespace.

Thanks,
Barbara