Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-01.txt

[Julien ÉLIE <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

>       Title           : Use of TLS for Email Submission and Access
>       Authors         : Loganaden Velvindron
>                            Stephen Farrell
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-uta-tls-for-email-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 5
> 	Date            : 2019-03-07
> 
> Abstract:
>     This specification updates current recommendation for the use of
>     Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to provide confidentiality of
>     email between a Mail User Agent (MUA) and a Mail Submission Server or
>     Mail Access Server.  This document updates RFC8314.

Instead of rewording all the sentences mentioning TLS 1.1 to now mention 
TLS 1.2, why not say to follow the recommendations of BCP 195?

Example:

    OLD

    "As soon as practicable, MSPs currently supporting Secure Sockets
    Layer (SSL) 2.x, SSL 3.0, or TLS 1.0 SHOULD transition their users to
    TLS 1.1 or later and discontinue support for those earlier versions
    of SSL and TLS."

    NEW

    "As soon as practicable, MSPs currently supporting Secure Sockets
    Layer (SSL) or TLS versions that MUST NOT be negotiated per [BCP195]
    recommendations SHOULD transition their users to a later TLS version
    encouraged to be used by [BCP195] and discontinue support for those
    earlier versions of SSL and TLS."

-- 
Julien ÉLIE

« Le rire est une chose sérieuse avec laquelle il ne faut pas
   plaisanter. » (Raymond Devos)