IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uta] mtp-tlsrpt-04 review

Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Wed, 05 April 2017 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4214B129498 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xaXxEx2Uw0hQ for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E14C129488 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a00:b900:109e:0:c5d6:c61b:f5e0:b51f] (helo=lap.dom.ain) by wizmail.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_RC100) id 1cvmPu-0004gW-Hw for uta@ietf.org (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:00:14 +0000
To: uta@ietf.org
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <52dde16a-a3bb-5844-7daa-a349def85049@wizmail.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 16:00:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: [2a00:b900:109e:0:c5d6:c61b:f5e0:b51f] (helo=lap.dom.ain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/edkAeHFwaVN0ferZGhUNam8uFU0>
Subject: [Uta] mtp-tlsrpt-04 review
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:00:21 -0000

The example in Appendix 9 implies that the Policy Domain
should correspond to the domain part of email addresses
attempted.  I think this should be made explicit in an
earlier section, eg. Section 3 ("A domain should") -
otherwise it could confused with the A-record domain
of an MX.

CNAME indirections should be explicitly discussed
(I'd like them permitted).

-- 
Cheers,
  Jeremy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email