IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-10.txt

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Thu, 16 August 2012 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA51521F854E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UY26ubmkn0uo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CDD21F851B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; l=5395; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1345147022; x=1346356622; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=sozIcLxvUU13+GO+hz7GOsoCR9qwJLUDuRzE6uwc3VY=; b=IW6kiWVvgzKr9YFNcDVTc7gERItZXg3POtmyQlkjh6cmJ/2UOc+1fNKQ lOZFpStc8XsPAnpK3aICDA/jHh4KtTxpz2URFMcri83VJKz7XrSnPjNgF LLMmc7+mjMiXnDy+4xnKpkb3wgeY1OxdESvOUvnMK2HnBup2UpeAboDI+ s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EALxPLVCtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFgkq3ZoEHgiABAQEEEgEaTBACAQgRBAEBCx0HMhQJCAIEDgUIGodrmlCgQ4sKhXdgA6N7gWaCXw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,780,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="112390322"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2012 19:57:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7GJv2B5031297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:57:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.230]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:57:01 -0500
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNe8thKDNXXf7km0GI992qo154CZdcpYewgABZxID//6xuEIAAWr0A//+yNcCAAB7/IIAAVhAA//+tGDA=
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:57:01 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89070948@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <20BACF78-57F2-4455-A0A5-F15822DB2015@nominum.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4ECD56@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <9E042EC6-07B9-4F7C-A50B-6A9F01BCD668@nominum.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4ECDB6@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <53DAE40C-AADF-490E-B471-CEB32407D651@nominum.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4ECEA8@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B890708FB@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <7FD516DF-3445-4E80-BD10-78C6096B823C@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <7FD516DF-3445-4E80-BD10-78C6096B823C@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.182.72]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19120.001
x-tm-as-result: No--41.516000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89070948xmbrcdx06ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Operations Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:57:03 -0000

No problem, Ted.  6204ter be OK.  We call bisbis as tertiary.

Thanks,

Hemant

From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:53 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: Bernie Volz (volz); Operations Operations
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-10.txt

On Aug 16, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
The -10 was published today to address review in the IESG.  Thus we really should stay away from adding any new requirement to rfc6204bis.

Okay, sorry-I didn't realize it was in IESG review.   Maybe in 6204bisbis...

v2.38.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status