IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DEF1294CC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:22:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.058
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4ITxb3zIW5r for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:22:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0103.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCAF71294AC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 07:22:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=1ovZn3qN2/WINUU/2a+Nk/SX7G2sj+YXdcfR908HlnY=; b=aiDQ9CfeG2OGhTZ9w7fn9br/XCLPF2DwsFrX9oBjoC6a7RARL1qPdc8xr9ah8338zz6WaSCOZnAg73IHZwrCY1WYRqGyADRt+DGlQEOFj/zjcBNRWGfYY722wfI0ri/QNGghiulpbSGumjW1wQIcT782qviZwQlRvF4sDv9C954=
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.21) by BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.6; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:22:54 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) by BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) with mapi id 15.01.0874.020; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:22:54 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
Thread-Index: AdJ71bub1L6aUKYaSxmQB+Og32Va4w==
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:22:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR0501MB20515AFB8ECBEB3A930E9B0DAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3738396f-facd-4733-4227-08d449ed079c
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2051;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB2051; 7: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB2051313313B52702011A41AFAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2051; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2051;
x-forefront-prvs: 0204F0BDE2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39410400002)(39860400002)(39850400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(51444003)(189002)(199003)(8936002)(5660300001)(6436002)(50986999)(54356999)(6506006)(25786008)(33656002)(8676002)(38730400001)(6916009)(3660700001)(575784001)(86362001)(77096006)(101416001)(81166006)(74316002)(81156014)(53936002)(99286003)(9686003)(55016002)(6306002)(189998001)(230783001)(110136003)(7736002)(105586002)(7696004)(66066001)(68736007)(6116002)(102836003)(3846002)(2906002)(106356001)(450100001)(2900100001)(3280700002)(107886002)(92566002)(122556002)(97736004)(305945005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2051; H:BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Jan 2017 15:22:54.8590 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB2051
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZB0xgms1LbIdqURyxZCVc7RE71w>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:22:57 -0000

Folks,

Some time ago, I queried the WG's disposition regarding draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=v6ops&index=x6OmZJ1n2F0rBX6iq5GHRBHWRO0&gbt=1). I think that the consensus was:

- Continue as informational
- Recommend against ULA-only
- Attempt to find some set of recommendations upon which the WG can agree.

So, if the authors are so disposed, I encourage them to produce a new version of the draft, leveraging what we learned during this email thread.

                                                           Ron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email