[v6ops] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The use of normative language in section 5 doesn't very consequent. While it is
okay for informational document to have normative language, I have the feeling
that the recommendation given in this document aren't very "strong" and
therefore it might be more suitable to not use any normative language at all.
Just a thing to consider before publication.

Minor comment: STUN ([RFC5389]) and TURN ([RFC5766]) have recently been bis'ed.
Please update to the new RFC/draft.