IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-jaeggli-v6ops-indefensible-nd

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 11 September 2018 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DE3130E39 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wI0uXZ2ZuZeo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 218F11277CC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j81-v6so136280ite.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dPaEQz7MkJT0hMwAXRl8jjgreHWTIeXEOCGOd4czN38=; b=XndBcIZq1UKTtKvcozzqVJ33x1LKU7MuaWSQxE0EwG488titoGyjHxq0l/XUUxLyKw a3cCHYiHCnAvZsOzOkBO3INhiROAhhMBjzc93zabP0x5zz4w5ae5QcJVTqfhH2YmY481 j24mnvoaGPS4fz+E/vG+TEaCLtrvaP7LEUn1vX7Xj4YDh/tHA3ld2yekubg3nP9xsdWE Vm3QtbyGUgN+8TlPvCnx5eLDtgEDyjK5VTXmBI0aoBRFcf9CsK9Qz55l5ItU8rNYkzV1 31/2As+iYz6xspEOcOAWE65AB0HZaGSEEkoQH2zNyCJGw2r9on/XKSqwuZxH24STGGjZ ENMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dPaEQz7MkJT0hMwAXRl8jjgreHWTIeXEOCGOd4czN38=; b=qIdYyL3QwdYKwGTxMqYCAYuYlXhTckG7m62VP7UQPZK1L8lo1DNhsGleOte3LnAsbn MrnrNIAOnbJsAr+Mp/DmLVngeVdLGIAKVgCOeXgYhmfKez3lRgE4B2rIPSlH8gxamImu bqXzhn7gEEXWZVGfawlJS8+HRYvjnw1K+14cqJXloUMYPvXn+AQkWgyploo4Wuzy4Vwz z0OCPBVqiv7hYckL6GEm3qjyWA81omWaZfGUFyO1j2xAcg+vwtdr86nAHqsquW2GJkWF OkXUrPxufQwFv8ughqjKvT1lqiI6Z1B4jHDcObacL0rEOdLY3JFic2zvo4ZEuTNSw1Ys xw5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AtMTmsdQ1HB2+K1vsleQ0scSLZ6RWyMjsRkEMSSdbqY1unjz81 qGVHlZp351IPnwhnTbvAgeo8qr3Q+OhNH+PBXqvYib1a
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdb6UEk0Gr4ZwXsij2MrXis7DwhoYZvk4jioqE7io+aaWuw4jMntgDpBCbIXgFIxhCIe0L9uOB+pqZGLuxJntyQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c4c6:: with SMTP id h6-v6mr21809989jaj.26.1536648456102; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR05MB4439DAC0BE86DF0503CEB41AE050@CO1PR05MB443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <AA63368D-923E-4890-B518-CA8B119BCD7E@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <AA63368D-923E-4890-B518-CA8B119BCD7E@employees.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:47:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr17t0_V4_rCsPSRRf_=Z6y2onoOyVM7OV9Ub3GXbpUKfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f6af7057592d95d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/uFV6uva0k4phH5KelPOKryFXPnU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-jaeggli-v6ops-indefensible-nd
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:47:40 -0000

You don't need stateful addressing (which has lots of downsides) to solve
this problem. SAVI-FCFS is sufficient.

On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, 15:15 Ole Troan, <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> You might want to include that this problem has been solved with a
> stateful address assignment mechanism like DHCP, possibly combined with
> SAVI.
>
> The ND ARO option would also have solved this.
>
> Or you could deploy P2P Ethernet, where there is no address resolution.
>
> Depending on DAD for this lie Lorenzo proposed seems ill-advised. It’s
> even less robust in wired networks (blocked ports).
>
> Cheers
> Ole
>
> > On 10 Sep 2018, at 16:25, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > Each week between now and IETF 103, we will review and discuss one draft
> with an eye towards progressing it.
> >
> > This week, please review and comment on
> draft-jaeggli-v6ops-indefensible-nd.
> >
> >                                      Fred and Ron
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status