Re: [vmeet] web-conference for discussing Local Communities before IETF 100

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Sun, 17 September 2017 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF1F13301E; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QNC0drEkzKh; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22c.google.com (mail-wr0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42FBC132F65; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id c23so4740501wrg.9; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jyUzzEU2+AoQ8HEMjoJEZpGQHHApwyJrUFx1bbf68LQ=; b=lvJsF1NTYZ6nEyo+RDYnLFRy6tyTLDASBWpoimuWkmaKbIJCsUcCKoKdt5qs3/JqIs tds9OqDyJoEdZmBRNTkyZl/X3DiMgXkTpL7xe0weiZcY5cYQ/usJWNjMkrNasEP1U7f+ 0BDFLuRRIRtyG7PBbOppYytGq87ItBckbMxjzBYuzUGdxsASpR9tk6muyEsE0hFPuqD8 GxnIto13UvkMBEiFoSidilXhIhqxHC/TpK57elHnQuxkBeBEhlri5LVJj/HUs77QTPbE t5EMtwyygg6ot3hZmogHGURgjzavGVJaY5FP+mt6RunjM6ecfo0/TmhCSdevAtCFJJhJ W9Iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jyUzzEU2+AoQ8HEMjoJEZpGQHHApwyJrUFx1bbf68LQ=; b=A5nQpEybVASMSdHULubIl0H+OBhDcPL/DfyPu97pBRRkzfn5ZRJUEwkCvsJK/CN2hO ERsA1rXBidjHQVNCX0ekOOghDfTKUlHW1zVy2QYNN5BXYLoJNW3quUIKPao83+DxU/17 9N9qldObnDhp4zAOMsopVieNU843icephNSQWSTgpphbeYKxhF9ZKMoXjOgDZnXrEF6M S75K62uac+IB2zi2Q7PHVSY6y5mdsIpropbPgH6nqqU4oKnrZObMlKrYc3xu14blhmwL Vqu7by8wp5e/qwwj9RnlDHB9jv9tmswtyRjzaF4RZb9s9vhsFonyYEqTglFBQGpUlzUc nFXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgGi1SjaAk3WkjbWTxYy+O6wxlgu/PopJz1s9vs9puWTKSdxMxt WJlrpf2ChsopM7nifsSDIL7OdFdEfqjm2xm8cEk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb50qoYyZT6cyL2UpLGaLc3JpUAJzzWRDOgXo8zsxh/BNWseZEqRlLNlsCPZDgNte1KIQQlqB3gidKkcEfagCYs=
X-Received: by 10.223.136.43 with SMTP id d40mr24830601wrd.121.1505675030573; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.136.153 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B384CCCF59C5AF9A3A5CE2B8@192.168.1.13>
References: <CAG4d1rcRyCOgD+L8p=WHcY6EDPr9648QnjcmHdu-8R=iObXUeQ@mail.gmail.com> <B384CCCF59C5AF9A3A5CE2B8@192.168.1.13>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 15:03:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rdjBg1ejg8m=sa+LJirLxseRfiXmMuTjtLgQ2QCo09QKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
Cc: vmeet <vmeet@ietf.org>, Christian O'Flaherty <oflaherty@isoc.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, "kwatsen@juniper.net" <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, sagarwal12@gmail.com, emo-dir@ietf.org, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114915965838840559674900"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vmeet/7P8ZwLAjeSUWwWYhWuBMRGxrhVk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:16:14 -0700
Subject: Re: [vmeet] web-conference for discussing Local Communities before IETF 100
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vmeet/>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:03:56 -0000

John,

Good point!  I'm happy to pick a different date - but before the draft
cut-off hopefully.

How is Oct 24 or 25 then?

Thanks,
Alia

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 1:45 PM, John C Klensin <john@jck.com> wrote:

> Alia,
>
> good idea, IMO.
> However, the 18th and 19th conflict with a set of important ISOC
> events (the 25th anniversary party and Internet Hall of Fame
> presentation) plus, I expect, a lot of informal side meetings
> (I'm a bit surprised Christian didn't mention that).  The
> combination of travel and an important religious holiday will
> also make the rest of the week difficult.
>
> Week of the 25th?
>
>   best,
>    john
>
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:52 PM -0400 Alia Atlas
> <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think it would be useful to have a web-conference to discuss
> > starting and organizing IETF Local Communities - so that we
> > can do the infrastructure work before IETF 100 and hopefully
> > get some additional ones started.
> >
> > We also need to nail down some of the policy issues and
> > discussions that are around
> > draft-atlas-geo-focused-activities-00.  This was a first stab
> > at what might make sense.  I'd like to get a new version done
> > before IETF 100 - preferably one that is closer to what makes
> > this community comfortable.
> >
> > Would Oct 18 (anytime) or Oct 19 (afternoon EDT) work?
>
>
>
>
>