IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Wed, 16 August 2017 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1DA132670; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=CyQw52dv; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=eaOjsuVG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdZVvZy3rrV6; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E501323C8; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D86209F9; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 04:52:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 04:52:52 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=DjcUuQk+irn3GjCuer 2dCHxwXvPhIyujys5WYHy2BSo=; b=CyQw52dvCkxvpZVCje0OhJ+lDomFDMEyoP Svv/GwtYEOGm9mxv/qxRncyYV54pomcWfbCt5jq647iybNaVdTSU2R7bcGpqblS4 NsylxbCEs97O1LuluIHYKG5R8Gv1j0Wb6/x9tyofqcgogf2oPvV32NYMA/2faf/B KQxYbTFE9qjL4GhEdvZnhQmblrFwMu635ujppDWvz5l/Swxr+hTVPs5xLUpNKRtV rNecC5XY0LSmWl9X6yLtyEBuVQeM6Aq+lPZDZ8dONotVsZ+aJcask8LcBOWwQ/+n GCFDgeBwT3U6H8yCaD0ExIUqhivLPifoEhIqeccYA3yXM0mrh35w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=DjcUuQk+irn3GjCuer2dCHxwXvPhIyujys5WYHy2BSo=; b=eaOjsuVG N2ZTo0QUrwEZHq7Pl/asIqF2vOEcuJNCoVEEj4zaxI8R4KfvESPenAwRuFF1AZNO 0XeyVCVJyWkKXCD5+jxlrxDYZzv/EDKuzefobrlY7bZzwOR2Dgpal8OHxfGvgory eCgei7wx5Jvb456FCu5ZWV92vuyAltRK0xajlCzFxYftDODbwQSjNPDn6i3tdGIr WEyZgdT/fTWCc22HsMhNw+jUKCGoHHrpng4xQMjWQnxOFzzNKTZWG9P4ZN4og4Qe Qd33UZIZVaMegY+eTMHc6kBei2G/Viy/XjY0C4u/icpQ9BmGJBshf1zUkTrqgFeK DeqcI8WTIyuB5w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:5AeUWWhftnngYE3QEyBLGlp3gsoBAN1y46askgN4hGDxqtsdv_uFyQ>
X-Sasl-enc: V1DxSR+zGPckfTMC4wTRtpYQcW/nCPg1qGlPWEuQvYbE 1502873571
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (cpc121086-nmal24-2-0-cust54.19-2.cable.virginm.net [77.97.145.55]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AA4EE7F986; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 04:52:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (14F89)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnU_QXMuVZMNycW=yj9-kU=v+Ooo5HV0v9p84zcYzdKA_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:54:24 +0100
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-webpush-vapid <draft-ietf-webpush-vapid@ietf.org>, webpush-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Phil Sorber <sorber@apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6B34A056-0C43-4065-839D-86BE93EF56FA@fastmail.fm>
References: <150285009047.12577.1184580798882485308.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnU_QXMuVZMNycW=yj9-kU=v+Ooo5HV0v9p84zcYzdKA_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/d6op29o_4rQPpAz3xyYuRSUsLRw>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-webpush-vapid-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 08:52:54 -0000

On 16 Aug 2017, at 07:09, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

>> - 6.3: Don't we usually list the IESG as the change controller?
> 
> I'm mostly cargo-culting here.  This choice didn't elicit comment when
> I asked for media-type review.
> 
> For reference, the last one of these that went through the IESG came
> back with very specific instructions, and a citation.  I can't find
> that email, or the citation, but I think that it was RFC 6838, Section
> 3.1, which doesn't seem particularly crisp:
> 
>   The "owner" of a media type registered in the standards tree is
>   assumed to be the standards-related organization itself.
> 
> I did find the documents that I remember: RFCs 8142 and 7946 use
> "Internet Engineering Task Force" and "IETF" respectively.  It seems
> like this isn't entirely consistent though.  I will accept the wisdom
> of the IESG on this matter.

IMHO, either IESG or IETF is fine. In both cases we know what you mean.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email