Re: [websec] STS ABNF, was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-04

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Mon, 26 March 2012 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E660621F8478 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.882
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.882 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.613, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4wxPXShR2FsO for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EC5821F8503 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17894 invoked by uid 0); 26 Mar 2012 08:29:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2012 08:29:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=1P3hpS4CZs2PO34IClV3WFVWeY+hrYQZkqYuLel5HRI=; b=i9Y2u85DecmTZXQH5EQmsDeuXczUok300XFChFjIiwD/JeCNaOertSkB4N+15V+p+a3knNzZWxxY/jbe7H1DnQRN3o1J8EoHq30pXGOFOPbm9Tb+Mmo+YIxKasHLiYvI;
Received: from dhcp-5698.meeting.ietf.org ([130.129.86.152]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1SC5JM-0002ay-Fp for websec@ietf.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:29:56 -0600
Message-ID: <4F702902.1060406@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:29:54 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 130.129.86.152 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Subject: Re: [websec] STS ABNF, was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-04
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:30:03 -0000

 >> I'm not sure how to cleanly and unambiguously define them in terms of
 >> both token and quoted-string (and retain max-age's basis on
 >> delta-seconds). Perhaps you could propose how to do this?
 >
 > Just define the base grammar for the overall parsing; such as

I would appreciate it if you would just plain propose the grammar you believe 
we should have.

thanks,

=JeffH