Re: [websec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06 until April-9

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 19 March 2012 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA87421F881C for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46jOen7SYiPh for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BE621F87DF for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1332188627; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=P1Rr+hCqLxtrowQjNooofAtYRQgVPpIKFkaz7YmV30o=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=J2N0+ixhRi8VpTVdk7IvrB6JsSCkHxQ8oedZo7dGGwFr7KEB7w4G7tEfwqeZjK2xbcNVnn PqvtgrmMhalKYL0n6/6Bx03AwY+fLL5q/5hoVvXX8sNCksS5DV1eywDBPGIAne0ttxZl1D Jf4KkQbfmuR8tYK9xszVr6s40dP47Iw=;
Received: from [188.29.240.8] (188.29.240.8.threembb.co.uk [188.29.240.8]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <T2eV0gBhuiur@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:23:46 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: PIPELINING
Message-ID: <4F678DFA.10009@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:50:18 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
To: websec@ietf.org
References: <4F66623F.9000300@gondrom.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F66623F.9000300@gondrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [websec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06 until April-9
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:23:56 -0000

On 18/03/2012 22:31, Tobias Gondrom wrote:
> Hello dear websec fellows,
>
> after reading the feedback, tracker entries and the updates on the 
> HSTS draft, the WG chairs and secretary have the impression that the 
> draft is in good shape and we like to ask for WG Last Call for this 
> document:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06
>
> As we are close to the IETF meeting in Paris, this last call will be 
> extended to three weeks and close on April-9. Please make a last 
> careful review of the draft and submit comments, questions and discuss 
> items for this draft ASAP. You can submit them via email to the 
> mailing-list or make entries for HSTS in the tracker. If you perceive 
> any major issues, it might also make sense to raise them during our 
> meeting in Paris on March-26.
I just would like to add that raising issues at a microphone in Paris 
doesn't replace sending them in email/opening a tracker ticket. And WG 
chairs would really appreciate reviews before March 26th.
>
> Kind regards and thank you,
>
> Tobias
> chair of websec
Alexey,
WebSec co-chair.