Re: [Webtransport] New mailer and IETF107 BoF on RIPT

Can you provide a bit more detail on the requirements relating to
WebTransport, such as REQ1?

   REQ1: The solution shall not require extensions or modifications to
   HTTP/3.

   REQ2: The solution shall work with both L4 and L7 HTTP load balancers

   REQ3: The solution shall work in ways that are compatible with best
   practices for load balancers and proxies supporting HTTP/3, and not
   require any special changes to these load balancers in order to
   function.

   REQ11: The solution shall provide low latency for media

   REQ12: The solution shall support audio and video

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:48 AM Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>
wrote:

> There is a new work effort underway to standardize an application protocol
> on top of httpbis for real-time voice and video, basically replacing SIP,
> RTP and SDP. This takes advantage of the usage of QUIC and UDP-based
> transport, that makes httpbis more amenable to real-time. The current draft
> also makes use of webtransport for media, falling back to just httpbis when
> not available.
>
> We've got a mailer set up:
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v3
>
> And you can read the core draft here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosenbergjennings-dispatch-ript/?include_text=1
>
>
> We'll be holding a BoF at IETF107 in Vancouver with the aim of chartering
> a working group.
>
> It would be great to get participation and support from the experts in the
> webtransport community.
>
> Thx,
> Jonathan R.
>
> --
> Jonathan Rosenberg, Ph.D.
> jdrosen@jdrosen.net
> http://www.jdrosen.net
> --
> Webtransport mailing list
> Webtransport@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
>

Re: [Webtransport] New mailer and IETF107 BoF on RIPT - voip over httpbis and webtransport