Re: [Webtransport] Request for Feedback: Draft Charter proposal

Dragana Damjanovic <dragana.damjano@gmail.com> Thu, 24 October 2019 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dragana.damjano@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B36120104 for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OICjkqLWmpnP for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1813A12004E for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id x3so20245457oig.2 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U6OWI1Iewy6ULjHNRzsf/rMg3KqEtgj6eEJ+hGio1Vk=; b=quPefFYmPrtMxOmFs73Q8EM5J1JfbqtNY4VPyDkCQS+3/+KqByhr1lXM277x4GgpLJ WW5n9CMmppRY8qpzMSFG73+GVhiXqjY+Obg79CQ8Fb72z3tyBNR6I0eqlkOXvdv78HPN P1da8uz8mofAWbqKppiD5XpAi5YLFgII9cg0qRozPSUeSaaO6KJvN2RjsuUIISI42TxL MAmlSpHjOFJsfLp9fNqNgoBOb7ZZ9vtcNcdVVhUlJv2haDH1L09YHOqTl9MH09Rgd59+ SRLSCi57bMqiaz80uBERjZIinwXgQyWqA4UtDL6YjNH6ZfjIB7SxwbP05fpbeHYT7Oyk 2E2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U6OWI1Iewy6ULjHNRzsf/rMg3KqEtgj6eEJ+hGio1Vk=; b=DxyiC7y7OGbMJ8nVz/mKeKNso1uqYXmD+qp0zD6TokkUn5ojjSKdzE89NInbwpdH3v grdWeWxDOVsupOsoeVzvqsYYkmWUqJoyDmN34XMHBHWWGti1m6bLsHElOQxLyqWKh2sf mVRMX9xEja2uVfVeDYUGxQYzyUtr8Hsl9DoaNukrDZyNocSk4eyolmqw9Hye4bqd6Ugq 9hQSe+IaRBoYyoFnkEYLHACvnqaFiXgn4k1J7I712l9QAmExhifEDVYesC0nt+SrfeCs yYzYURxzzGSXoAzY7Ey+auNp7PBjM/NCjOw+r+yFZ0rPVbaRmVXVMh0xLEyW4qGGMO/q A9FA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWVM4cE1mjRF36mZgyjFHAhFNrKuG3EGkkKdA5WVmMcLYbtzEc k2DcjsoJhhEdTlvfvbI9a4/7BZiUA3GiQ7siPAV+6A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwM68HuqeSrCjbXokIy6OgcdKcrqwcWrloiZH76n0dHPDwCdlM5YGhPvRF/DpSKZK9WbiXp+anDMzIn78/4dpM=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4787:: with SMTP id u129mr3932065oia.25.1571915045977; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOW+2dvGYQPOu8GmM011fwkqz5StqXS4qbDBXoOz1ncMYCSJsA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAZdMafWGM-dVb9_R0Wz=YPe=U70J5qTpwVNUtcJXmDrBLteEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAZdMafWGM-dVb9_R0Wz=YPe=U70J5qTpwVNUtcJXmDrBLteEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dragana Damjanovic <dragana.damjano@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 13:03:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG0m4gST0ex4dKKvOCTbs5FF-NMNv+=j0LFXtnod-abRnS-cHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: webtransport@ietf.org
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eec3110595a5fdca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/nbkc3lNAP_l4eP3JoIKL64q1Vn4>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Request for Feedback: Draft Charter proposal
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:04:09 -0000

The charter says that it will coordinate with WICG or W3C but still has a
shipping/last call dates which are not dependent on the coordination.

Dragana

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:06 AM Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv=
40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hello Bernard,
>
> Thanks for the charter draft!
>
> I have a few suggestions:
>
>    1. I think in terms of milestones, we might want to put WebTransport
>    over QUIC earlier than WebTransport over HTTP/[23], since it's both simpler
>    in nature and is currently under active development in Chromium.
>    2. I'm not sure it would be wise to explicitly put WICG into the
>    charter, as WICG expects the specs to migrate elsewhere as soon as they
>    reach a certain level of maturity (so we'd need a recharter when that
>    happens, which I'd prefer to avoid).
>
> I also feel we should be somewhat more explicit about what points we
> expect to coordinate with W3C (i.e. we should coordinate on requirements,
> but not on protocol details).
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:35 PM Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As many of you may have noticed, there will be a (non-WG forming)
>> WEBTRANS BOF at IETF 106:
>> https://trac.tools.ietf..org/bof/trac/
>> <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/>
>>
>> With the IETF 106 schedule due to be finalized soon, we are working on a
>> draft agenda which we hope to post to this list sometime next week.
>>
>> While the upcoming IETF 106 BOF is non-WG forming, we have gotten some
>> feedback from the IESG  suggesting that we jumpstart discussion of a
>> potential WG charter.  So as to solicit feedback, we've put together an
>> early draft of a charter proposal, which is enclosed below.
>>
>> Please note that this proposal assumes that dependencies such as work on
>> QUIC datagrams (e.g. draft-pauly-quic-datagram and
>> draft-schinazi-quic-h3-datagram  ) will be handled elsewhere, such as in a
>> re-chartered QUIC WG.
>>
>> WebTransport (WEBTRANS)
>> ---------------------------------------------
>> Charter
>>
>>>
>>> Chairs:
>>>      David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
>>>      Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Applications and Real-Time Area Directors:
>>>      Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
>>>      Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
>>>      Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
>>>
>>> Applications and Real-Time Area Advisor:
>>>      Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
>>>
>>> Mailing Lists:
>>>      General Discussion: webtransport@ietf.org
>>>      To Subscribe:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
>>>      Archive:
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/
>>>
>>> Description of Working Group:
>>>
>>> The WebTransport working group will define new protocols or
>>> protocol extensions in order to support the needs of the W3C
>>> WebTransport API <https://wicg.github.io/web-transport/>.
>>>
>>> These protocols will support:
>>>   * Reliable bidirectional and unidirectional communication
>>>     that provides greater efficiency than Websockets
>>>     (e.g. removal of head-of-line blocking).
>>>   * Unreliable datagram communication, functionality not
>>>     available in Websockets..
>>>   * Origin checks to allow supporting the Web's origin-based
>>>     security model.
>>>
>>> The WebTransport working group will define three variants:
>>>   * A protocol directly running over QUIC with its own ALPN.
>>>   * A protocol that runs multiplexed with HTTP/3.
>>>   * Fallback protocols that can be used when QUIC or UDP
>>>     is not available.
>>>
>>> The group will pay attention to security issues arising from
>>> the above scenarios so as to ensure against creation of new
>>> modes of attack, as well as to ensure that security issues
>>> addressed in the design of Websockets remain addressed
>>> in the new work.
>>>
>>> The group will coordinate with the W3C Web Incubation Community
>>> Group (WICG) with respect to the above deliverables to ensure the
>>> best possible match between the WebTransport protocol extensions
>>> and the W3C WebTransport API. The group will also coordinate with
>>> other working groups within the IETF (e.g. QUIC, HTTPBIS) as
>>> appropriate.
>>>
>>> Goals and Milestones:
>>>
>>>   March 2020 - Adopt a draft on WebTransport over HTTP/3 as a WG work
>>> item
>>>   March 2020 - Adopt a draft on WebTransport over QUIC as a WG work item
>>>   March 2020 - Adopt a draft on HTTP/2 fallback mechanism as a WG work
>>> item
>>>   March 2020 - Adopt a draft on a QUIC fallback mechanism as a WG work
>>> item
>>>   September 2020  - Issue WG last call on WebTransport over HTTP/3
>>>   September 2020  - Issue WG last call on HTTP/2 fallback mechanism
>>>   November 2020   - Issue WG last call on WebTransport over QUIC
>>>   November 2020   - Issue WG last call for QUIC fallback mechanism
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Webtransport mailing list
>> Webtransport@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
>>
> --
> Webtransport mailing list
> Webtransport@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
>