Re: Seeking feedback on www.ietf.org

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sun, 01 December 2019 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22634120835 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 17:47:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wyxIDWGZit6I for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 17:47:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2C912082D for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 17:46:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [119.94.163.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AACA935DF54; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 02:46:56 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Seeking feedback on www.ietf.org
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>, Greg Wood <wood@isoc.org>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA945BC10@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <a98bcd4f-8285-bc3d-0f2e-128c287d58e9@pi.nu>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:46:50 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA945BC10@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/kCV4f5GxRjfCNxwkUvcpZ6xzw1I>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 01:47:02 -0000

Qin,

The round robin lost list has been working well for at 10-12 years. 
Don't mend if it is not broken.

/Loa

On 19/11/2019 09:59, Qin Wu wrote:
> Not sure the round robin list moving is a good idea, I think the review on specific topic should be assigned to the one who has a good expertise on that topic.
> Randomly selection on reviewer seems like national lottery, which I don't like.
> 
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: WGChairs [mailto:wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Yemin (Amy)
> 发送时间: 2019年11月19日 9:50
> 收件人: Greg Wood <wood@isoc.org>; wgchairs@ietf.org
> 主题: RE: Seeking feedback on www.ietf.org
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I'm not in Singapore this week. But I would still like to give some feedback regarding the RTG DIR review system.
> When a draft is assigned to a reviewer, if no reply received from her/him, I will mark it as "No Response".
> In the old versions, the reviewer marked with "No Response", will go to the end of the review list. So I will reassign with next reviewer in the round robin list.
> But in the current version, the reviewer marked with "No Response" stay at the top of the list.
> 
> It's better not to continue assigning the draft to the same people, because of the high probability of no response.
> What's done in the old versions to put them in the end of the list is more reasonable, so we could assign to next reviewers.
> Get the round robin list moving, the probability of next reviewer will be much higher than the one with no response, according to my experience.
> 
> BR,
> Amy
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: WGChairs [mailto:wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Greg Wood
> 发送时间: 2019年11月18日 8:46
> 收件人: wgchairs@ietf.org
> 主题: Seeking feedback on www.ietf.org
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We are seeking feedback on the www.ietf.org website to understand how well it works and how it might be improved, particularly for IETF working group chairs.
> 
> If you have 15 minutes during the week of IETF 106, I would appreciate the opportunity to have a conversation.
> 
> I have set up a Doodle Poll to find a time that works for the first 4-5 respondents:
> 
> https://www.doodle.com/poll/euhamn6wbsdhwv3q
> 
> (We can plan to connect just b y the IETF Meeting registration desk and find a spot nearby.)
> 
> Please let me know if I can provide any additional information.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -Greg
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64