Re: tools.ietf.org hiccup?

[Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Stefan,

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Stefan Winter <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> looking at my radext wg status page, it looks like tools.ietf.org is
> terribly confused.
>
> It lists drafts which are long published as Active (like
> draft-ietf-radext-vlan of 2006!) and for drafts which really are active
> it has wrong states, like Waiting for Shepherd writeup instead of IESG
> Processing for raidus-grafmentation. Similar skewed results seem to be
> on the dime status page. I haven't checked any other.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/
>
> Considering that this is a cluster of machines, and my connection has
> ended up at a "test" instance at earlier occasions - does everybody see
> what I see?


I just pointed this out to the IESG, but (on a possibly related note), I
happened to be looking at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ippm/, and noticed that
at least one of the "Active" documents had a 2007 date.

Upon further poking, the list contains both drafts like
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ippm/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update/, which has
already been published as an RFC, and
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ippm/draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis/, which actually is
active, in the way I might think of as "active".

Am I confused, or is this a change from having two separate sections (one
"active", the other "published as RFCs")?

Spencer