Re: [woes] Proposed BoF agenda

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Wed, 13 July 2011 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: woes@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4706F21F87A5 for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RRzt2j0tsXKH for <woes@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A02121F8797 for <woes@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.7.153) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:27:27 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC201.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.8.198]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:27:27 -0700
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "woes@ietf.org" <woes@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [woes] Proposed BoF agenda
Thread-Index: AQHMQX3vPVTKh4NqHEifLuioce1PC5TqgI/w
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:27:26 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394348D47567@TK5EX14MBXC201.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <13E17156-7FC8-47DB-B04C-52F4EF6E68E1@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <13E17156-7FC8-47DB-B04C-52F4EF6E68E1@vpnc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.35]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [woes] Proposed BoF agenda
X-BeenThere: woes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Web Object Encryption and Signing \(woes\) BOF discussion list" <woes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/woes>
List-Post: <mailto:woes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes>, <mailto:woes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:27:29 -0000

I strongly disagree with the "basing on CMS" wording.  I'd be OK with wording more like "drawing upon existing inputs such as CMS, XMLDSIG, and XMLENC".

There's a lot to reuse from these documents.  But it's prejudicial to have a discussion that starts from the assumption that we are basing this work on CMS.

				Thanks,
				-- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: woes-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:woes-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 9:57 AM
To: woes@ietf.org
Subject: [woes] Proposed BoF agenda

Greetings again. Richard and I propose the following agenda for our meeting that is in less than two weeks:

Agenda for WOES BoF, IETF 81, Quebec
Richard Barnes and Paul Hoffman, temporary BoF chairs

Agenda bashing, blue shee launching - 5 min Maining list history of the proposed charter (Richard/Paul) - 15 minutes A word from our sponsor (Stephen/Sean) - 5 minutes Charter issue 1: key format - 20 minutes Charter issue 2: basing on CMS - 20 minutes Other charter issues - rest of time

(We will post this to the IETF agenda site later when they allow us to.)

Suggested changes to the agenda are welcome. More discussion of the charter in the coming two weeks is even more welcome.

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
woes mailing list
woes@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes