[Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 01 November 2019 16:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpack@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CF1120B54 for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uNKc35Ijz_L3 for <wpack@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF296120B57 for <wpack@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g3so4800235ljl.11 for <wpack@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9lrVOrdFWi7Dz99FJIIaDGrtri63BxhZaTQItv+ilGs=; b=Rae0sihUsMZhQ0bWItKUsCfn1lmHkmogFm0hKdfzUAOtvIVKfaRtuDnXmXeyYyIvsV TIlfYHOEr+dfUV+qg5+8jtQZ1zFIBoTP4iKlQ20JeGCR5VWC3ABh0Sw725kHuUylTcwn wHc8NGY3YGPFqKqYV/y9Uau6/f9BrbHwx7Pt6NA0p0/TWWFATPkyp8evCACtEU5giKU5 J0OLxBoc9phDOKOOaFkPCA7Eq53vh38nJXPA/9wNkch+UyuGmR1s/SuUr7yJjk1KKHLm sLglbEBNwFGfGef0/smx/+COpFJGJh5ih2QK/xeNMh1G6W7Z7Wo+n1SjHmb1Eb/tjt9C WkIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9lrVOrdFWi7Dz99FJIIaDGrtri63BxhZaTQItv+ilGs=; b=UnQXyoUx1TLqA3mkP8CcWwuZLtsGbbd3TubTv5KWEyBk1OyYvRR33JukJCKJVFoXu2 YVzsxDh7ssvJVRMbeBifO2o0piS8frx83SIu4gde2IwpBr6c4OrVL6DKt85lYeVr5UnQ /gaaAlR5jzmj7pYDjtVc1Yyp86bEW3QNZ20bsVUuVWOiK7Eqzd5aq84csHLjSN1IKyEA TFbCfBHp+3H2fTNDrk+3PrJnpP1KsOLDnCFbvRYHKsVIYry+KmEz7akJmdJiluKD9s6P B7BOgvirLwiAPa24vbEgD6VESbwRUtMagE46YByrCwaewc34s6qbqb8ZMgthIU1hqgD2 elPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU2EPlyIuj6whVqeXGYqKyEyRp3YIAJf6MnJVJpwKev8GJgVz0b oL6eNNC48tAAAdDEybmGxAyPfNB1itGR4mwVOKMHfzp8X2M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyvhLNwpKl147KdXKy7oIwuBzuQNhr/qYjMCpkUmrmARJ+hnImdB8MY31EM4bOf3eG/At+6qmI9Xq4ZGvLYgFU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3e18:: with SMTP id l24mr9080002lja.48.1572627468854; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:57:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNmJiwhqEAVz6BUzTVzjm1LS4tRNfpFqG4avs6s03q7mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: lake@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, wpack@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a5325905964bdd40"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpack/gnC-yK_1hRFakk_Aih0JUt2Jhn8>
Subject: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict
X-BeenThere: wpack@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Packaging <wpack.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wpack/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpack@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpack>, <mailto:wpack-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 16:58:02 -0000
Hi IESG folks, I regret missing this earlier, but the conflict between LAKE and WPACK is really bad. I can think of a whole pile of people who are potentially implicated in both (myself, Sean Turner, Richard Barnes, Martin Thomson, ...). It would be really great if we could move one of these. I know it's always really hard to make the schedule work and individual suggestions always seem to miss the big picture, but what about swapping LAKE with SUIT? ISTM that there's a lot less overlap there. -Ekr
- [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Wpack] [Lake] LAKE/WPACK conflict Christopher Wood
- Re: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Wpack] LAKE/WPACK conflict Barry Leiba
- Re: [Wpack] [Lake] LAKE/WPACK conflict Richard Barnes