Re: MPEG asks for MIME review for the MPEG21 file format

"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> Fri, 18 May 2007 05:54 UTC

Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l4I5ss6S087949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 May 2007 22:54:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id l4I5ssa0087947; Thu, 17 May 2007 22:54:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from sam.opera.com (sam.opera.com [213.236.208.81]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l4I5soMD087895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-xml-mime@imc.org>; Thu, 17 May 2007 22:54:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from annevk@opera.com)
Received: from annevk.hotspot.sfr.fr ([80.124.175.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by sam.opera.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l4I5sWTp002599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 May 2007 05:54:33 GMT
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:54:32 +0200
To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>
Subject: Re: MPEG asks for MIME review for the MPEG21 file format
From: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software
Cc: "'Dave Singer'" <singer@apple.com>, "'Graham Klyne'" <GK@ninebynine.org>, ietf-liaisons@ietf.org, "'Christian Timmerer (ITEC)'" <christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>, ietf-types@alvestrand.no, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E94B6002-BAE6-4D08-98A3-89E8D46504F3@stewe.org> <AE61ED01-9B91-4D5D-8654-AF8DD1B86EA2@stewe.org> <464814BE.4090208@ninebynine.org> <p06240821c26e59493bca@[17.202.35.52]> <4649B0BA.4040002@ninebynine.org> <p0624084bc26f9de750bc@[17.202.35.52]> <002901c798b8$0f9ab4f0$2ed01ed0$@org> <892351513.20070518031209@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <op.tsidc6yf64w2qv@annevk.hotspot.sfr.fr>
In-Reply-To: <892351513.20070518031209@w3.org>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.20 (Win32)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.1/3267/Thu May 17 20:40:58 2007 on sam.opera.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-mime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-xml-mime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

On Fri, 18 May 2007 03:12:09 +0200, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>; wrote:
> The successor to RFC 3023 needs to indicate that binary XML which is  
> presented as a new encoding (in the xml sense) can use +xml, while other  
> binary forms cannot.

You wouldn't be able to still parse the retrieved resource in that case  
with a generic XML parser. Wasn't that the whole idea of +xml?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>