IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc] RFC date format?

Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Fri, 13 September 2019 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D70F120842 for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I4QKSADVUgFu for <xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE60B1200F9 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id a11so22725453wrx.1 for <xml2rfc@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FwrCpC6+KjmW0P2NXnr3Gw7SZmjs5dC05hHhYHaudbw=; b=sH/REDerSPO8N6NjaXfcD+4BI6pkMDEMy28wCtC7SFumvV1oOSx2oWAX+uUEEn4h9w x9S6PuUT5IcBuiAkcHOZ0kV/Il4WM9M9b/FsfAGuZ53os4IP0XVfq9P20dcjwCSa9mxK x35sX6mCPewENuqSiR6YrxJHZKvzGNWEPrP+jexzInjRIXMLCRpPIC95Mk0wTZNS/nF+ j5b5+r5xx6PhHbDly9OVRPjmdVA5I3AxXczUdGwjYsZmaKV8dT77OHzEnvanGrud1vWd PHbmyUtSGr/8f9HE3A54jLDQvAsrLmb8YX5Y58bSl0QAtNtrRxg+mRZj0oLRIj6CIr8s dhOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FwrCpC6+KjmW0P2NXnr3Gw7SZmjs5dC05hHhYHaudbw=; b=k9pCeiwExpdHejIUc2XavYiqIwM+aBeYMv+V4ny3KsS4u8v8hd2fH+l/Mqmai+3h2d qPctVqz1Fm9YHJIdStvK8/jJgiMDZYWJSqfnFkEmGfMkaV79Ei2aYWD1/smSkePNNL6+ 5IHKnIEK1T3ncRsIb/73XCTeSlhI24ici6U4uuHZdSJJNpZf5r2xLyAgFj//2r0L7aQd u5Bq9t41Z8Vhf8bsUolY78OoCfDyNeShsq8mCgkXDlelRtMiFfoxK+ec86KRrDSsCum+ W1NSts1ukzhdFVA83Bkm3QYY4QwprA7JiSbuENAUXV7m4subJZnwc9Oxgw26ULsOpqUH oiYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfqIdlbnS0w/HI0J4bMaQhyf5cPHLcyF6b8Zq0h9woPXp/Bilg cVpcu/O+qOt8e6Ai0S4cD2+0/lUn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxYXoxe1xEc73Ho+DgBhv3/9xv2NUzlzqLaPE7cN0lxsfgiNB8nonOh04mWctxs0vsqUM0m0g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:152:: with SMTP id r18mr3749922wrx.153.1568387926809; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.79] (25.131.146.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.146.131.25]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x15sm2050359wmc.16.2019.09.13.08.18.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, xml2rfc@ietf.org
References: <85e59f6d-f4d7-cc4c-93c2-5d3ee8dbd438@gmail.com> <a7344819-c320-9a03-6ca2-e129fc150ce5@levkowetz.com> <a566f342-aef1-2628-9eff-2b3c74387edb@gmail.com> <b293160b-a648-1f0e-8f90-a81347af7177@levkowetz.com>
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <42746d08-1aef-fe42-f31e-204ed4d6620e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:18:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b293160b-a648-1f0e-8f90-a81347af7177@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc/wcbU_-DP06oUNEUfGomtxywBX8U>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC date format?
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <xml2rfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>, <mailto:xml2rfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:18:51 -0000

Hi Henrik,

On 2019-09-13 17:07, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> Hi Anders,
> 
> On 2019-09-13 17:02, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>> On 2019-09-13 16:56, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>>> You can choose format with the --legacy-date-format switch, except for the
>>> boilerplate which has a fixed format.
>>
>> Hi Henrik,
>>
>> This does not seem to address my concern about mixed date formats in submitted documents and that the Web tool does something else.
> 
> In that case, you must give me more specific information and examples in
> order to understand and possibly debug.

If you run the V3 Web tool and ask for RfcMarkup for
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cyberphone/ietf-json-canon/gh-pages/xmlv3/draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme.xml
you will (of today at least) see that all dates are in the new format.

The published version submitted as as XML
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-08
shows dates in old format except for
"This Internet-Draft will expire on 16 March 2020."

Cheers,
Anders


> 
> 
> 	Henrik
> 
> 
>> Anders
>>
>>>
>>> On 2019-09-13 16:05, Anders Rundgren wrote:
>>>> After submitting (in XML V3 format)
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-08
>>>> I see that you haven't fully made up your mind regarding date formats.
>>>>
>>>> In the version created by the Web tool dates have changed to
>>>>
>>>> nn month year
>>>>
>>>> while the submitted generated version mixes the traditional and new date format.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think there was a problem with the old format but what's more important is maintaining consistency.
>>>>
>>>> thanx,
>>>> Anders
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> xml2rfc mailing list
>>>> xml2rfc@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email