[yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-07

Radek Krejčí via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 28 March 2021 15:12 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Radek Krejčí via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161694435512.26324.17317214765333286054@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Radek Krejčí <rkrejci@cesnet.cz>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 08:12:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/U3TDAiR0BiD-v4eT1Bzv1jRsrkU>
Subject: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-07

Reviewer: Radek Krejčí
Review result: Ready with Nits

The I-D document contains a single YANG module ietf-l3vpn-ntw.

The document as well as the module seems fine to me, I have just a single note,
which is probably actually my fault from the previous review of the connected
ietf-vpn-common module. There is `Section 4` reference in the module's
description to the IETF Trust Copyright information, but the correct reference
is supposed to be `Section 4.c`.

[yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of dr… Radek Krejčí via Datatracker
Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review o… mohamed.boucadair