Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Sat, 12 September 2020 05:35 UTC
Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8129A3A0D25; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GpM2-adb1F2X; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 519553A0D20; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id m7so10256992oie.0; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wse0NUF59z9qr38VgJt66getkzPKyI6bWLLdUIpO140=; b=Jzf8VxbHcFKRpb1/+cRQea3czc2p0Rm8XZy8pzrHD0wmKHEfNOmj3pNnzABf6w7bUW MmDzIsqMdmtJnCqFX+uIzaPyG9SuHt5suIpQdMjCjOsyjH2w6QpZqhcni46/ZOQekRDn 7lgt7eRwjkobytV14a78o2wVWRiAqdrhB/W8vEbUnF1XwmoijJe0xv5jN4TiWVGBcaWe 5U+aU/kVsDZtJ+WhCv+gO9LsbFgfKEbO1ALrzFO2UOHO3qsiDaUAgE+2dD8msoq4nlTo Cu0BW2dy5hLCSVhQkBUePoqakic6LR59aM+0zKts8qro0kl+sS4JjjsDuAD+gOXiXcRc aK9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wse0NUF59z9qr38VgJt66getkzPKyI6bWLLdUIpO140=; b=i391mdhH5AE7mGKAZQ7A2rvK+HnTC/FTBf+EoT07EkOwcN6yx0/HJi9lUiwzwSzjat p887KSh3eb/C6dppypnDFoof2rElC2zp08cc49bVzIW0431TnhB4n7jayLy4PtzX5BBD B0x+nkXo/fnBUzc3AiTK5Ll3vGfpgagroCRewA7eX8qChFdRSoXd+ghbbreckGioNp+K DDDKTRiF7vj7jYkQaNDDOyUKs4tUgNhvJzB2fsC++B1LI2Zw8qmwh1nORtdsfufrHYW4 gmEKTzvt2IDx62NVw+MvAlrl/3RXTabmNbDmTbyPRHN1rda3jTxEb2HLTa12+ET4bibR NCeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Rs1amVnSutFPEarrZzbT9c/F8OZSHfsiJzEyJFEM5C44F7QzX 2gn5xNx0hXSwOEcHzyUO/xteOqz+c5U0JJan0DvIfIW5fak=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5PJQfISZQKeahjZW/r8DGnx09IJi1fclx0o4fpEJ9WgTmx+w0q6OQCMVrrRy4TSR/OkzGWz8bxCDCWzoJwbU=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3184:: with SMTP id x126mr3212869oix.54.1599888934629; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <VI1P194MB0285CFA9B82DE9DDDD2F8992AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <463db63e-5249-4976-94ca-2dcf5f89b6fc@si6networks.com> <VI1P194MB02856D38706F983182117FA9AE250@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB02856D38706F983182117FA9AE250@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:35:08 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2w9S8mV1MQ48A_fKb=WXkWFEBWN1J_BOnZqR-3pSUDwng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "v6ops-chairs@ietf.org" <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/xRDHwv3TjnDmPVVn-fPD38X09E0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 05:35:38 -0000
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 14:42, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote: > > Hi fernando, > > IPv10 is not an address structure, it is a “solution” that allows ipv4 and ipv6 to coexist and communicate to each others peacefully without any problems. > > I was fighting to make it be used before the problem goes bigger and all of us will pay the delay cost, i’m trying to help as much as i can to make it easier for the benefits of all and move first to the solution before the problem occurs clearly. > The fundamental problem that I think you see with IPv6 - lack of adoption - is going to apply both equality and now more to your proposal. IPv6 is being adopted, Google are now seeing 30% of their traffic come over IPv6, and there are now more than 90 000 IPv6 routes in the IPv6 Internet route table. https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html APNIC are also tracking adoption: https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6 > Regards, > > Khaled Omar > > Get Outlook for iOS > ________________________________ > From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> > Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:33:39 AM > To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> > Cc: v6ops@ietf.org <v6ops@ietf.org>; v6ops-chairs@ietf.org <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 > > Hi, Khaled, > > As a wg participant, may I ask how IP*v10* would be within the > charter/sphere of *v6*ops? > > Thanks, > Fernando > > > > > On 11/9/20 20:42, Khaled Omar wrote: > > Hi Ron, > > > > Hope my I-D is clear for you, let me ask if we can reserve a slot for the IP-v10 I-D to be discussed during the next coming meeting so we can solve the problem that IMHO became clear for everyone even students. > > > > Good Luck, > > > > Khaled Omar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Khaled Omar > > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:56 PM > > To: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 > > > > Hi V6OPS WG, > > > > Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session? > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06 > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Khaled Omar > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF Meeting Session Request Tool > > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:52 PM > > To: session-request@ietf.org > > Cc: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org > > Subject: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 > > > > > > > > A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Fred Baker, a Chair of the v6ops working group. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Working Group Name: IPv6 Operations > > Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Fred Baker > > > > > > Number of Sessions: 1 > > Length of Session(s): 2 Hours > > Number of Attendees: 100 > > Conflicts to Avoid: > > Chair Conflict: spring lsr 6man intarea idr > > > > Key Participant Conflict: rtgwg tsvarea panrg grow tsvwg > > > > > > > > > > > > People who must be present: > > Fred Baker > > Ron Bonica > > Warren "Ace" Kumari > > > > Resources Requested: > > > > Special Requests: > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > v6ops mailing list > > v6ops@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > > > _______________________________________________ > > v6ops mailing list > > v6ops@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > > > > -- > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for I… IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Fernando Gont
- Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request f… Khaled Omar
- [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Simon Hobson
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Clark Gaylord
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Lencse Gábor
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Lencse Gábor
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Ola Thoresen
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Ola Thoresen
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Wilhelm Boeddinghaus
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Wilhelm Boeddinghaus
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops Khaled Omar