Subject
From
Date
List
[Cbor] CDDL validation - a tools comparison[Cbor] CDDL validation - a tools comparison
Jeremy O'Donoghue
2026-08-11
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/R9c3hjaQ8DRjBJtHBXu4YTB5Ybo/
3789001
2269792
[Cbor] Re: Remove non-JSON decimal number forms and leading + in numerals from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)[Cbor] Re: Remove non-JSON decimal number forms and leading + in numerals from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/UiN34yQLrdC2IWK61pitsqFCj_A/
3788266
2269449
[Cbor] Re: Remove non-JSON decimal number forms and leading + in numerals from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)[Cbor] Re: Remove non-JSON decimal number forms and leading + in numerals from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)
Joe Hildebrand
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/_XRlSLpJq2SMaMItRb1CKmaYYMk/
3788373
2269449
[Cbor] Re: Remove non-JSON decimal number forms and leading + in numerals from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)[Cbor] Re: Remove non-JSON decimal number forms and leading + in numerals from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-13
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/hIBW-Cbgofoy2bT050GRcjRbQLY/
3789926
2269449
[Cbor] Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)[Cbor] Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals)
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/YUue9jSD8XMNWtRogTPf9X-JxsI/
3788261
2269448
[Cbor] NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))[Cbor] NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/XSCaLjjzgkvKCDhgZtAZhLJ9eJ8/
3788445
2269448
[Cbor] Re: NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))[Cbor] Re: NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))
Vadim Goncharov
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/tgWQ-WlFSOmVIF_VTm_SzzP881c/
3789549
2269448
[Cbor] Re: NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))[Cbor] Re: NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/f2x2SrysiHREgkYp9xfhK80XQOg/
3789635
2269448
[Cbor] Re: NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))[Cbor] Re: NOT removing bactick-delimited strings (was Re: Remove rawstring extensions from CDN (draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals))
Vadim Goncharov
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/njkoZZV14cfV4WhGI9UpB_Y7q5o/
3789782
2269448
[Cbor] RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/dbq1Q06oqxgR23M17Cl1UoJWpkY/
3788197
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Jeremy O'Donoghue
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/ZV4g5aA1alcvrPn3LvZHTjChpSo/
3788201
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Carsten Bormann
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/Gn8ySHtCQUBzTi11BeVZejCuMbo/
3788207
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Carsten Bormann
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/bbyMU6Oo1IczDM88-6WVgBfKZ10/
3788203
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Michael Richardson
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/D9LnEEziP9fYtVdUcrqDhIhAiAI/
3788205
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Carsten Bormann
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/k-f-AyVu1bgNRpLlVaYVd0MQFGk/
3788212
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Vadim Goncharov
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/7dVmiDo-5PXOZ3qYikXDBX8wo60/
3788234
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Brian Sipos
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/_-uolxVIL9lOKeV_IOBee6cXCyg/
3788659
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Vadim Goncharov
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/JZhMVtOUJWSNRtgljOj-8cG_I6A/
3788670
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/XDw2hjAl-bdgg5hZxsV5EprC9nY/
3788673
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Brian Sipos
2026-08-11
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/2uBt7odMyKngKkFkH9KeJwmi6-s/
3788864
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-11
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/0wcGxpmAfYxhbPL-BGsEhTm0VCc/
3788920
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/v5dF0MQPF9P5qf6K8d_48iav39I/
3788680
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Carsten Bormann
2026-08-11
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/MhUIqn-39LLJR25NNUeFHOR_I64/
3789023
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/TIGGs1GhEdG7f20M_8GWYZ9beEE/
3789544
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Anders Rundgren
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/ZBGRUweh-oTK0kNRuHUl0t-YRi0/
3789562
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/-mZwZmM4WknY6rIY1p1VtHBEbEk/
3789729
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Anders Rundgren
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/rz5-oSW5PGG4czyP6Amk9H31QYU/
3789762
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-13
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/2wR8iWGMlk3Gn4RyOpS1ZxmkWoM/
3789920
2269435
[Cbor] Partial Implementation Support (Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?)[Cbor] Partial Implementation Support (Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?)
Carsten Bormann
2026-08-13
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/xvn2K274xyzsBNsJssWuoy3_s28/
3789969
2269435
[Cbor] Re: Partial Implementation Support (Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?)[Cbor] Re: Partial Implementation Support (Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?)
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-13
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/v9xGApL6NZehrJt16SCuJw-QQ6Y/
3790219
2269435
[Cbor] Re: Partial Implementation Support (Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?)[Cbor] Re: Partial Implementation Support (Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?)
Carsten Bormann
2026-08-14
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/o5N3rmfFqQS5R7TaE5d0GAvuqGY/
3790610
2269435
[Cbor] .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))[Cbor] .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-16
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/1bDx0xSzVySHUpiHH2CDhfRMcXU/
3791134
2269435
[Cbor] Re: .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))[Cbor] Re: .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))
Anders Rundgren
2026-08-17
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/gvHXc_nocD09zWsZGGlT2f0KMGg/
3791351
2269435
[Cbor] Integer data types in CDDL application models (Re: .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))([Cbor] Integer data types in CDDL application models (Re: .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))(
Carsten Bormann
2026-08-17
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/OgnzBlfARcjCg4SuXBDdF1vHxJ8/
3791379
2269435
[Cbor] Re: Integer data types in CDDL application models (Re: .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))([Cbor] Re: Integer data types in CDDL application models (Re: .serial operator (was Re: Partial Implementation Support (REe: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?))(
Anders Rundgren
2026-08-17
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/hQbeTGlMIrYyOu80QH58ZGwtGW0/
3791442
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Anders Rundgren
2026-08-13
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/1HU2svxc1RgiqjQC0WEzRZFLFyE/
3789928
2269435
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Vadim Goncharov
2026-08-12
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/k2J7nAsHJOBXcIje2eQ1UEhBV_Q/
3789779
2269435
[Cbor] RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Laurence Lundblade
2026-08-09
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/UrU4DiIsxnXnwEpPLA4wT42JK6g/
3788195
2269434
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/zy8o-5lz5IQnl63-0fud3CYbQLI/
3788467
2269434
[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?[Cbor] Re: RFC 8610 validation depends on bignum unification?
Rohan Mahy
2026-08-10
cbor
/arch/msg/cbor/hQGJ-KXU7xOjXjClyodTCTdrS7w/
3788473
2269434