Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposal to Enhance Email Trustworthiness via RFC 8617 Modification - ARCRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposal to Enhance Email Trustworthiness via RFC 8617 Modification - ARC
John R. Levine
2024-04-22
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fIFoyKZMpsINAEkKPBeil6cOKNc/
3451738
2130504
[dmarc-ietf] Proposal to Enhance Email Trustworthiness via RFC 8617 Modification - ARC[dmarc-ietf] Proposal to Enhance Email Trustworthiness via RFC 8617 Modification - ARC
Alessandro Bertoldi BCS
2024-04-21
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/vBlJXec_4sU0ZXj-EE0FUPK9Q8c/
3451415
2130504
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: WG Review: Mail Maintenance (mailmaint)[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: WG Review: Mail Maintenance (mailmaint)
Murray S. Kucherawy
2024-04-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/v9sLCVXj1GBU_J3XKLzG5f5Cdpc/
3451184
2130370
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Thoughts on choosing NRe: [dmarc-ietf] Thoughts on choosing N
Douglas Foster
2024-04-16
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/4iwVKa5rhqAciYruef1dOxeXpPU/
3449774
2127040
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Thoughts on choosing NRe: [dmarc-ietf] Thoughts on choosing N
Todd Herr
2024-04-15
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/XDqJGIDT3PY55LMLwxn0cbzYGR0/
3449567
2127040
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Murray S. Kucherawy
2024-04-01
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/3DySrqxRmK4gO92_x8rGfQi-e7I/
3444129
2127139
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Baptiste Carvello
2024-04-01
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/aoeVapHBdUydFibnbyF4VOK47V4/
3444044
2127139
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30[dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Tero Kivinen
2024-04-01
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/iX9wvxstdyL01kIazDJmM2aYDrQ/
3444033
2127139
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30[dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
2024-04-01
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/mSP2yYek6F7HmUmLE-3Y0hQtVe0/
3443988
2127139
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-31
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/We-AUblFG71yiEDZdIbkE-X-1E4/
3443923
2126967
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Murray S. Kucherawy
2024-03-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/8_PYPYeQDezFquFaTbba7Mmd2TY/
3443805
2126967
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Jim Fenton
2024-03-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/r7hHnN3BDKg0G0tMaCDJpbsUjyA/
3443799
2126967
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30[dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
2024-03-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/p9Ll1zkx-wn2LEZ5zoQDoVyDQoE/
3443794
2127040
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30[dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Jim Fenton
2024-03-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/zwZtb3w4mD87OcFaOh_nCyREBPM/
3443670
2126967
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML SchemaRe: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Alessandro Vesely
2023-11-15
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/-JaeNehN6KmZmdXM6f-xbhes6uA/
3384468
2097958
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML SchemaRe: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
John Levine
2023-11-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/JVQwE3wtG1YXf824j8cHyd8tPKs/
3384203
2097958
[dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema[dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
OLIVIER HUREAU
2023-11-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/sS9dMwiFNo2Ns0VtVah-lRTwVnA/
3384119
2097958
Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policynameRe: [dmarc-ietf] p=interoperability p=compliance p=orgname:policyname
Hector Santos
2023-08-23
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/EY3R8bQoU2Q5DiFXWBY0WCrtf8A/
3347037
2074304
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Wei Chuang
2023-07-15
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fwB8WYLyvktgZHVZzufwb_kfNvA/
3330291
2072207
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/_OYM3_N523HH5_Bvu_iopzviggM/
3303718
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Hector Santos
2023-04-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/NxbCZhtYhVeQ7cnLtXl2p033Yik/
3303713
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Receiver-side authorization, was Delegated authentication for GmailRe: [dmarc-ietf] Receiver-side authorization, was Delegated authentication for Gmail
Alessandro Vesely
2023-04-23
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/5xIeQOjrOmdaX4p0c3gT_xTe09A/
3302679
2062057
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject?
Douglas Foster
2023-04-05
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/FuVkCslwj-a5YVwXaCO-oZ3M0vY/
3296512
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text to close out Ticket 96Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text to close out Ticket 96
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-05
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/PL8JDAfyChnGYbgOw9_wmO3Zmu4/
3296501
2059996
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting - one DKIM signatureRe: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting - one DKIM signature
Douglas Foster
2022-11-01
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/aag6D8dcKpvXdhuu5latonDtI_4/
3242996
2037447
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting - one DKIM signatureRe: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting - one DKIM signature
Alessandro Vesely
2022-10-31
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/h0BzvvkPcXUEHw1mfSSw39lixuI/
3242663
2037447
[dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting - one DKIM signature[dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting - one DKIM signature
Douglas Foster
2022-10-30
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Xe1qRciT7PXHGkyoq7SBPFLi2G8/
3242519
2037447
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policyRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policy
Douglas Foster
2022-08-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/NCzD7Y__zvPc-5Geg_x0EBlFbAA/
3216844
2026517
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policyRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policy
Scott Kitterman
2022-08-28
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZAZET8PNzrJrSzsmolpJv9y2vJc/
3216710
2026517
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policyRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policy
Douglas Foster
2022-08-28
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/EDu4j59YwhOSAdKBSZcGzAq0h-c/
3216709
2026517
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policyRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policy
Barry Leiba
2022-08-28
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fI_MLZVpO9ExGsmJLSaVT6REsJI/
3216702
2026517
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policyRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policy
Douglas Foster
2022-08-28
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/tXEEFiCT1P8NIKesqYh5GtrhoI8/
3216698
2026517
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policyRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policy
Barry Leiba
2022-08-27
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/I2nuSbdvYtxRlBBYIhbn4cxCN0U/
3216607
2026517
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policyRe: [dmarc-ietf] Issue opened: Use a four-valued token for the four roles of a DMARC policy
Seth Blank
2022-08-27
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/WTcnaEB3jpzmo3DmAI1A-eLqSfo/
3216589
2026517
[dmarc-ietf] Proceeding with draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis[dmarc-ietf] Proceeding with draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis
Barry Leiba
2022-08-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZXqAFGNBvL1V9gsomjQRpi54sMo/
3216290
2026462
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mailing List message authenticationRe: [dmarc-ietf] Mailing List message authentication
Barry Leiba
2022-08-26
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/c9JFPMMO-q1mQXhFCqr4Df1r1pA/
3216285
2025719
Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walkRe: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk
Dotzero
2022-07-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/p7kGUmcDBqbp50ubms39JvoXSgc/
3200543
2017612
Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walkRe: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk
Murray S. Kucherawy
2022-07-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/7ioHGOADD8kBnHz7FV0YGqtbF8E/
3200538
2017612
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF doesn't accommodate third level .name domains?Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF doesn't accommodate third level .name domains?
David Bustos
2022-05-31
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/PiRf8rkxVnI63FqERV4jTj2AFbM/
3184239
2013980
[dmarc-ietf] ARC's role, was Best Guess SPF should not be deprecated.[dmarc-ietf] ARC's role, was Best Guess SPF should not be deprecated.
Alessandro Vesely
2021-12-07
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/X_wt9DlL5saUOVy9ZDe8aw4QJoQ/
3101814
1982744