Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.orgWeekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Thomas Narten
2007-06-29
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/GJjcniYadiYVRSXuEfYU90d7Umw/
615073
1338915
Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFCLast Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC
Douglas Otis
2007-06-29
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/rvqd7YoPdE90IyrZ0shT829yMUI/
615072
1344549
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Ralph Droms
2007-06-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/m6qfxvaxbRwlTwoC3EGtGzfdJgs/
615071
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Michael Thomas
2007-06-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/K9VDbUO6xAFuNv_9YgpVXSqXpJI/
615070
1344562
Re: IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? )Re: IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? )
Joe Touch
2007-06-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/GnBiepObKdBF9ggAYlYT0G_XfTk/
615069
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Brian E Carpenter
2007-06-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/0mmQpu8ZPQUxWmcdoZjWhOmu-TE/
615068
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Brian E Carpenter
2007-06-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/nlRVHzXprwvhAMU5IP54TyMbTeI/
615067
1344562
IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? )IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? )
Harald Alvestrand
2007-06-28
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/UW00BssupmFoV5aWQmESDhvwJwo/
615066
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Michael Thomas
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/cPXTwsJmkWMztzwISOCd-Qubk-4/
615065
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Keith Moore
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Cz7OhDa9rEqrmLqcH698VGTbHsc/
615064
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Joe Touch
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Ei7FIPtVoGrSdrNiTo6UA6X3-Uk/
615063
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Brian E Carpenter
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/nqCcFD4y6iuVXb5TqBnyx0YFL8c/
615062
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Joe Touch
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/0hXgdhsckI9X-L0xpiNkKo17aGE/
615061
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Keith Moore
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/UncSY5dQCi0knH2bwBkAyF4PWgk/
615060
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Joe Touch
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/hziFxXjMJYpfmHW2s8ieDTvCN9s/
615059
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Brian E Carpenter
2007-06-27
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Jg1BGzQWDPr6Yb0M_9JGjhVu00o/
615058
1344562
Has anyone looked at the DISCUSS Criteria document lately? (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago))Has anyone looked at the DISCUSS Criteria document lately? (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago))
Spencer Dawkins
2007-06-26
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/-QLSko4l9iSRb9Tn3aulFKEoMYU/
615057
1344562
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Randall Gellens
2007-06-25
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/yIpf0NgbcWmiqRgA2MEdocG8n9M/
615056
1344562
Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivityRe: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
Jim Martin
2007-06-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/Fu-vlUmDC4tb7l1EtibLh2Ms_KM/
615055
1344545
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Joe Touch
2007-06-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/2A1St7serv2bWNmSR7I8e3C5Eiw/
615054
1344562
RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 38, Issue 40... Content of IETF digest.RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 38, Issue 40... Content of IETF digest.
Mohammed Shahnawaz
2007-06-24
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/IeFy7X61s9xth5rh56uuBcgV6WY/
615053
1344550
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
Chris Newman
2007-06-23
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/L1VR8H9HaUNkTVUR8kehYVwGVZI/
615052
1344565
Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
John C Klensin
2007-06-22
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/RRtuwou178P9bj_fuGUnkZfYuz8/
615051
1344562
Udaya V Kumar is out of the office.Udaya V Kumar is out of the office.
Udaya V Kumar
2007-06-22
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/VtZEOJ3jNWRquF7KtM3kq8A-IRI/
615050
1344551
Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFCAutoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC
jburguet
2007-06-22
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/lL4ldJLaq3q7gU1KkpZn2oUTRVk/
615049
1344552
Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.orgWeekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org
Thomas Narten
2007-06-22
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/mBFx6MU6BhF8KUQX5erhndgmKlg/
615048
1338915
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
Tony Finch
2007-06-21
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/42ZprQRaiw-b8tJR_JuHyA1X3vM/
615047
1344565
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
John C Klensin
2007-06-21
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/1Y__gJ83QPXj9gCr0GaJoXfichg/
615046
1344565
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
Tony Finch
2007-06-21
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/_TdonjoXo_Od0OK1BpTu5SKBGpI/
615045
1344565
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
John C Klensin
2007-06-21
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/h8mG7IxDRabZSGLV7W9oOJqdEZw/
615044
1344565
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
Dave Crocker
2007-06-21
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/tb3t_zM0WlQ5FrNCs2bZ4Vlb-wU/
615043
1344565
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
Tony Finch
2007-06-21
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/69dbJRVuhZmQGWwik8WgYywbIu0/
615042
1344565
Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCPRe: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
John C Klensin
2007-06-21
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/78jL8cmXoIAqWwQU-MTXGR4YNqM/
615041
1344565
Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extnsRe: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
John C Klensin
2007-06-20
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/AyvdipgM8-wHrujXJLJH2tAvWcQ/
615040
1344563
Re: ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78)Re: ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78)
Brian E Carpenter
2007-06-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/PpmX1s_F0S3DxjszYRmXcrkAysk/
615039
1344556
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed StandardRe: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
Tony Finch
2007-06-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/cz0dctouq-O_xkPiFinisY2xdjY/
615038
1344556
ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78)ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78)
Dave Cridland
2007-06-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/vy0HlT1344b2JFgJajduAJGrsno/
615037
1344556
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
Brian E Carpenter
2007-06-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/dpc8e9XpKdO5StgB5-NButJf6O8/
615036
1344558
Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-splitRe: Last Call: draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split
Brian E Carpenter
2007-06-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/4c18nNqNlUKhnapAA1AdrJcS4Us/
615034
1344553
Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
John C Klensin
2007-06-19
ietf
/arch/msg/ietf/7h_d-8TpPHAUhgcRZJLgGjN3UJw/
615033
1344558