ipr-wg

RE: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensingRE: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

David Rudin (LCA)

2013-08-16

Re: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensingRe: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

Stephan Wenger

2013-08-15

Re: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensingRe: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

tsg

2013-08-15

RE: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensingRE: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

Turner, Kimberly A

2013-08-15

Re: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensingRe: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

Stephan Wenger

2013-08-15

RE: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensingRE: RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

David Rudin (LCA)

2013-08-14

RFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensingRFC3979bis section 7 -- hierarchy of preference for licensing

Stephan Wenger

2013-08-13

Re: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?Re: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?

Vincent Roca

2012-11-06

RE: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?RE: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?

Polk, William T.

2012-11-06

Re: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?Re: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?

Ted Hardie

2012-11-06

Re: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?Re: Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?

Russ Housley

2012-11-06

Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?Are IPR disclosures necessarily transitive?

Vincent Roca

2012-11-06

Re: Determine the stream of an RFCRe: Determine the stream of an RFC

Russ Housley

2010-01-17

Re: Determine the stream of an RFCRe: Determine the stream of an RFC

Freek Dijkstra

2010-01-17

Re: Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1Re: Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1

Russ Housley

2009-11-29

Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1

Todd Glassey

2009-11-29

Re: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSFRe: Current mailbombing is instigated by FSF

TSG

2009-02-28

Re: Jorge - Answer these questions -Re: Jorge - Answer these questions -

TS Glassey

2008-07-24

#1514: incoming 2: definition of terms in section 1 not normative#1514: incoming 2: definition of terms in section 1 not normative

Harald Alvestrand

2007-11-26

ISSUE incoming 2: definition of terms in section 1 not normative (was: Re: ISSUE: Which parts of -incoming are normative?)ISSUE incoming 2: definition of terms in section 1 not normative (was: Re: ISSUE: Which parts of -incoming are normative?)

Simon Josefsson

2007-11-26

Re: ISSUE: Which parts of -incoming are normative?Re: ISSUE: Which parts of -incoming are normative?

Harald Alvestrand

2007-11-19

Patent policy and this mailing list (Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG)Patent policy and this mailing list (Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG)

Harald Alvestrand

2007-06-08

Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESGRe: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG

todd glassey

2007-06-07

Re: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESGRe: Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG

Scott W Brim

2007-06-07

Effective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESGEffective vs intended handling of patent encumbrance in IETF wg and IESG

Thierry Moreau

2007-06-07

Re: Lawyer's advice on boilerplate in RFCs and I-DsRe: Lawyer's advice on boilerplate in RFCs and I-Ds

Steven M. Bellovin

2007-03-21

Re: IETF IP Contribution PolicyRe: IETF IP Contribution Policy

todd glassey

2007-01-19

RE: IETF IP Contribution PolicyRE: IETF IP Contribution Policy

Lawrence Rosen

2007-01-19

FYI: 3979 update (was: I-D ACTION:draft-lynch-execd-tasks-00.txt)FYI: 3979 update (was: I-D ACTION:draft-lynch-execd-tasks-00.txt)

Frank Ellermann

2007-01-19

RE: IETF IP Contribution PolicyRE: IETF IP Contribution Policy

Contreras, Jorge

2007-01-18

IETF IP Contribution PolicyIETF IP Contribution Policy

Lawrence Rosen

2007-01-18

Protocol Action: 'Clarification of the 3rd Party Disclosure procedure in RFC 3979' to BCPProtocol Action: 'Clarification of the 3rd Party Disclosure procedure in RFC 3979' to BCP

The IESG

2007-01-15

Re: IETF Trust FAQRe: IETF Trust FAQ

Simon Josefsson

2007-01-15

Publication request on draft-narten-ipr-3979-3rd-party-fix-00.txtPublication request on draft-narten-ipr-3979-3rd-party-fix-00.txt

Harald Alvestrand

2006-11-27

Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights tomodify sourceRe: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights tomodify source

todd glassey

2006-07-05

Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify sourceRe: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source

Simon Josefsson

2006-07-05

Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify sourceRe: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source

todd glassey

2006-07-05

Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify sourceRe: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source

Brian E Carpenter

2006-07-05

Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify sourceRe: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source

Simon Josefsson

2006-07-04

Re: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify sourceRe: NEW ITEM: Does RFC 3978 3.3.a.(E) grant third parties rights to modify source

Joel M. Halpern

2006-07-04

FILTER BY TIME

FILTER BY FROM