Subject
From
Date
List
Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6Re: [Ltru] Issue #46 (AD comment 13) MAY -> can in section 4.6
CE Whitehead
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/bCbqmZOFsll5Tu2OJA2QQSpMMHw/
877218
1468134
Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codesRe: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes
CE Whitehead
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/pXmyU2jK11Zg9VjknoynKaD05gU/
877217
1468135
Re: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappingsRe: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings
Doug Ewell
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/qj1cfxseE58OsKH_AKRJ1eAO7XA/
877201
1468137
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Doug Ewell
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/z_pm3ZsgVFYcFGNgZ1NNtf8T8TM/
877189
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Mark Davis
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/Xk06B-SxEONPs9uEC7MppVgOerM/
877199
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Doug Ewell
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/w9C5qQk1EPQ5Th6EcMbf-hY6ZkQ/
877202
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Mark Davis
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/hTmGQltwbjJ5azWCOhQ3REcp9Mg/
877203
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/RGdtsHdgWVYBzriGJybNz6vo_EA/
877206
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Doug Ewell
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/qgWlJi9sDJIukdjKJb6zpOH0Ncg/
877204
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Mark Davis
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/9aUoddOBDQ-AOHo3kaXvCaIltA4/
877205
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Doug Ewell
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/BZi-g9qB6lkgWT4WmyJXG4IhI_M/
877220
1468136
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8
Doug Ewell
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/z-N3TGtFLFbaB9cKbFTvsj7lxUg/
877175
1468138
[Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt[Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/fOR3KnT3QTQRoZHH-_wtpLP4hfo/
877162
1468139
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txtRe: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/ROlG2d__siKApInB28hrjP-FZ5E/
877163
1468139
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txtRe: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/53is4jdCy666m43v2aiaZULBJmg/
877164
1468139
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txtRe: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/Iz6ONaAvHt6zZxLfnGZU3TSwja4/
877170
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?[Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/g0q3zS6P6na91FU1upyfxA0aL7Q/
877165
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?
Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/geybsyF3CpnF9RjE8VTSqFMATy0/
877167
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?
Martin J. Dürst
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/0thG9Uk4UOjZYXW9zsV_5BeeiPg/
877207
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?[Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/FAqPnv4l9Lel4sSD2KAKfKxOGgI/
877166
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes[Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/MIn9MdbulBnFk502QEwr-oP2Guw/
877168
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codesRe: [Ltru] Issue #36 (AD comment #3) rules for UN M.49 codes
Mark Davis
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/EVagdOcGP7aLhzExvOCbeAzLoAg/
877194
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note[Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/JDZ83OzajI_kysXteIOOy1ahxTc/
877169
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 noteRe: [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note
Mark Davis
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/Of92hjRsIjF5DixgbbvxzRkEiyg/
877193
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8[Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/pH5zcUYCoxQgislUF67dg8eRAgo/
877171
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8
Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/0yyyNERztI3z6X9YcF8t7zOYxII/
877174
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8
Martin J. Dürst
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/8ssJkbcksTtKGiXijri1DjtD29o/
877208
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8Re: [Ltru] Issue #38 (AD comment #5) ABNF vs UTF-8
Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/kSuolkWH55TCYTh4ksJWRT7EfiQ/
877215
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #39 (AD comment #6) field name occurance limit[Ltru] Issue #39 (AD comment #6) field name occurance limit
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/ErgIvBNttD-Ql4ItucoJpHowgSE/
877172
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #40 (AD comment #7) section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49[Ltru] Issue #40 (AD comment #7) section 3.4 on ISO 3166 vs UN M.49
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/PJl3ERCvTkgdzGv-8JLj0OXn_fg/
877173
1468139
[Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST[Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/wcqtGYGjbbPuWZgFqXdrWlEuYDc/
877176
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/2UeRLLnyfr4TCyv8YrnhaHPexrQ/
877182
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Martin J. Dürst
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/sNiMY1sSfxNX7MSYunvg3HV2Otk/
877210
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/16OHfbSvvsjaGQnbyU451SZLejw/
877216
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/TEHc2PXs_NkK3HQWtBk5QvPGOvk/
877224
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUSTRe: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Mark Davis
2009-04-12
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/FHsu-r_Q6KM76ZBobOYEFTwd-Ho/
877221
1468139
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txtRe: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
John Cowan
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/dzBD0ahWxaWzKvCa35R-yYD7SRs/
877177
1468139
Re: [Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?Re: [Ltru] Issue #35 (AD comment #2) what is meant by "permanently reserved"?
Randy Presuhn
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/xDiSkP6DbE3Q_3s_GU8Eje99K8g/
877192
1468139
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txtRe: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
Doug Ewell
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/LE5JyosVs0gPPLELR8TZfAGtuxg/
877178
1468139
Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txtRe: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
Michael Everson
2009-04-11
ltru
/arch/msg/ltru/5P2Aetot0Fpfl4XiPMpmd6RpRVE/
877190
1468139